International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research
Abbreviation: IJIAAR | ISSN (Online): 2602-4772 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiaar

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2022, Vol. 6(3) 184-194

Investigation of the Relationship Between the Pod Properties and Quality Values of Some Bean Varieties

Leyla Idikut, Duygu Uskutoğlu, Songül Çiftçi & Gülay Zülkadir

pp. 184 - 194   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2022.475.2

Published online: September 30, 2022  |   Number of Views: 12  |  Number of Download: 52


Abstract

It is important to know the quality values of the products in terms of production and consumption of plant-based foods, and at the same time, it brings the examined product to the forefront in terms of production and consumption. For this reason, 11 commercial bean varieties were grown as the first crop in Kahramanmaraş ecological conditions in 2018, and in this study, it was aimed to examine the relationship between the pod characteristics and quality values of 11 commercial bean varieties. In the study, the correlations between bean cultivars' pod setting time, pod length, grain yield per plant, thousand-seed weight, pod ratio per plant, protein ratio, oil ratio and starch ratio, as well as all correlations between investigated characteristics were also investigated. It was determined that there were statistically significant (p< 0.01) differences between bean cultivars in terms of pod setting time, pod length, thousand-seed weight, pod ratio and protein content per plant, and significant (p< 0.05) differences in grain yield and oil content per plant. It was noted that there was no significant difference between bean varieties in terms of starch ratio

Keywords: Bean Quality Values, Correlation Analyze, Phaseolus vulgaris, Protein Ratio, Starch Ratio


How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Idikut, L., Uskutoglu, D., Ciftci, S. & Zulkadir, G. (2022). Investigation of the Relationship Between the Pod Properties and Quality Values of Some Bean Varieties . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 6(3), 184-194. doi: 10.29329/ijiaar.2022.475.2

Harvard
Idikut, L., Uskutoglu, D., Ciftci, S. and Zulkadir, G. (2022). Investigation of the Relationship Between the Pod Properties and Quality Values of Some Bean Varieties . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 6(3), pp. 184-194.

Chicago 16th edition
Idikut, Leyla, Duygu Uskutoglu, Songul Ciftci and Gulay Zulkadir (2022). "Investigation of the Relationship Between the Pod Properties and Quality Values of Some Bean Varieties ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 6 (3):184-194. doi:10.29329/ijiaar.2022.475.2.

References
  1. Anlarsal, A.E., Yücel, C., Özveren, D., (2000). Determination of grain yield and yield-related traits and the relationships between these traits in some bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars in Çukurova conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture Forestry, 24: 19-29. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anonymous (2017). Product report dry beans. Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Development.(TEPGE). [Google Scholar]
  3. Anonymous (2018). Food and Agricultural Organization.(FAO) http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. (Accessed on 17 January 2018). [Google Scholar]
  4. Atlı, A., Köksal, H. and Dağ, A. (1994). Quality Values in Edible Grain Legumes. Food Industry, 7(3), 44-48. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aydoğan, S., Şahin, M., Akçacık, A.G., Hamzaoğlu, S., Demir, B., Güçlübilmez, Ç.M., Gür, S. and Keleş, R. (2020). Determination of quality properties of some dry bean genotypes in Konya conditions. Academic Journal of Agriculture 9(2): 259-270 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  6. Bagheri, M., Kahrizi, D. and Zebarjadi, A. (2015). Study on genetic variation and morpho-phenologic traits in Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Bıharean Bıologıst 11 (1): 43-47. [Google Scholar]
  7. Barros, M. and Prudencio, S.H. (2016). Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Common Bean. Semina: Agricultural Sciences, 37 (2), 751-762. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bozoğlu H (1995) A Study on Determination of Genotype × Environment Interaction and Participation Degrees of Some Agricultural Traits in Dry Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Doctoral Thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Institute of Science and Technology, Samsun. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bozoğlu, H., Smiler, A., (1999). Determination of correlations and heritability of some agricultural characteristics in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Turkey 3rd Field Crops Congress (15-18 November 1999), Volume III, Meadow-Passage Forage Crops and Edible Legumes, 360-365, Adana. [Google Scholar]
  10.           Cengiz, B. (2007): Quality characteristics of some common bean varieties grown in Sakarya and Eskişehir locations. – Master Thesis, Namık Kemal University, Institute of Science, Tekirdag, Turkey (in Turkish with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  11. Ceyhan E (2004) Effects of Sowing Dates on Some Yield Components and Yield of Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 9(2) : 87-95. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ceyhan E, Önder M, Kahramani A (2009) Determination of Some Agricultural Characteristics of Bean Genotypes. Selcuk University Selcuk Journal of Food and Agricultural Sciences, 23(49): 67-73. [Google Scholar]
  13. Çakmak, F., Azkan, N., Kaçar, O., Kapaklü, N., (1999). Determination of agronomic characteristics and yield potential of some dry bean lines. Turkey 3rd Field Crops Congress (15-18 November 1999), Volume III, Meadow-Passage Forage Crops and Edible Legumes, 354-359, Adana. [Google Scholar]
  14.           Dalkılıç, M.  (2010). Konya ekolojik şartlarında farklı zamanlarda ekilen maş fasulyesi genotiplerinin verim ve bazı tarımsal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniv. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarla Bitkileri Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi 51 S. [Google Scholar]
  15. Demircan Ş (2018) Development of High Grain Yield Dry Bean Lines. Master Thesis, Selcuk University, Institute of Science and Technology, Konya. [Google Scholar]
  16. FAO,( 2018). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  17. Güneş, Z., (2011). Determination of Yield and Some Yield Components in Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Lines with Hope in Van-Gevaş, Master Thesis, Yüzüncü Yıl University, Institute of Science and Technology [Google Scholar]
  18. İdikut, L. and Karabacak, T. (2020) Investigation of Grain Characters of Some Bean Varieties in Eastern Anatolian Conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 8(9): 1918-1922 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kahraman, A., (2014). The Effects of Sowing Time on Yield, Yield Components and Quality Traits in Dry Bean Genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Master Thesis, Selcuk University, Institute of Science and Technology. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumar, K., Kumar, P. and Khan, A. (2020) Optimization of PGPR and silicon fertilization using response surface methodology for enhanced growth, yield and biochemical parameters of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under saline stress. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101463 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  21. Laura, E. Y. L., Azize, O., Arlette, A., Joel, A., Joelle, T., Gustave, D., and Alexandre, D. (2018). Morphological characterization of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces of Central region of Benin Republic. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 10(11), 304-318. [Google Scholar]
  22. Önder, M., Özkaynak, İ., (1994). The effects of bacteria inoculation and nitrogen application on grain yield and some characteristics of dwarf dry bean varieties. tr. J. of Agricultural and Forestry, 18: 463-471. [Google Scholar]
  23. Özbekmez, Y., (2015). Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Seed and Technological Characteristics of Some Dried Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties and Genotypes in Ordu Ecological Conditions, M.Sc., Ordu University Institute of Science and Technology. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pekşen, E. (2005). Comparıson Of Some Common Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Genotypes For Seed Yıeld And Yıeld Related Characterıstıcs Under Samsun Condıtıons. J. of Fac. of Agric., OMU, 20(3):88-95 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pekşen, E. and Smiler, A. (2005). Relationships Between Yield and Yield Components and Path Analysis in Some Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Genotypes. J. of Fac. of Agric., OMU, 20(3):82-87. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pooran-Chand, (1999). Character association and path analysis in rajmash. Madras Agricultural J., 85: 188-190 [Google Scholar]
  27. Rezende AA, Pacheco MTB, Silva VSN, Ferreira TAPC. (2017). Nutritional and Protein Quality of Dry Brazilian Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).Food Science and Technology. 38(3): 421-427, doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.05917 [Google Scholar]
  28. Sehirali, S., 1988. Edible Grain Legumes. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publications: 1089, Textbook: 314, 435 p., Ankara [Google Scholar]
  29. Ulukapi, K., and Onus, A. N. (2014). Phenotypic evaluation of some Turkish green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 46(4), 1415-1420. [Google Scholar]
  30.           Ülker, M., and Ceyhan, E. (2008). Orta anadolu ekolojik şartlarinda yetiştirilen fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) genotipleri’nin bazi tarimsal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 22(46), 77-89. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yeken, M. Z, Nadeem, M. A, Karaköy, T., Baloch, F.S and Çiftçi, V. (2019). Determination of Turkish Common Bean Germplasm for Morpho-Agronomic and Mineral Variations for Breeding Perspectives in Turkey. Kahramanmaras Sutcu University, Journal of Agriculture and Nature Sciences 22 (Suppl 1): 38-50. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yolci, S. M. (2020). Conditions Determination Of Yield And Yield Components Of Some Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Varieties İn Ercis (Van) Ecological. European Journal of Science and Technology No. 18, pp. 562-567. [Google Scholar]