Yield and Yield Components in Barley Genotypes (<em>Hordeum vulgare</em> L.) Genotypes under Rainfed Conditions

İrfan Öztürk

doi:https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2023.536.7

Original article | Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2023, Vol. 7(1) 104-114

Yield and Yield Components in Barley Genotypes (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes under Rainfed Conditions

İrfan Öztürk

pp. 104 - 114 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2023.536.7

Published online: March 29, 2023 | Number of Views: 43 | Number of Download: 288

Download PDF

Abstract

Grain yield and yield components in barley are complexes depending on the environmental effects and agronomical practices under rainfed environment conditions. This research was carried out in the Trakia region in Edirne (Turkey) location during the 2017-2018 cycles. The experiment was set up with 25 genotypes in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications. Grain yields (GY), plant height (PH), peduncle length (PL), spike length (SL), number of kernel per spike (KNS), spike weight (SW), spike number per square meter (SNM) and flag leaf area (FLA) were investigated. The combined analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant differences among genotypes for all parameters (P<0.01) except spike length and spike number per square meter. Averaged the overall mean grain yield, genotypes G4 (8432 kg ha-1), and G21 (8119 kg ha-1) had the highest grain yield. Kernel number per spike varied from the lowest to 20.8 (G11) and the highest to 49.2 (G22) in genotypes. The longest peduncle (30.7 cm) was measured in G13. Genotypes G7 (8.46 cm) and G14 (8.23 cm) had the longest spike length. In the research significant (p<0.01) difference was observed in the flag leaf area in barley genotypes. Genotype G23 had the largest flag leaf area (12.67 cm2) and followed by G11 (12.10 cm2). Grain yield was positively correlated with peduncle length (r=0.554**) and spike number per square meter (r=0.442*). Spike weight and kernel number per spike were positively and significantly correlated (r=0.666**). Flag leaf area positively affected and increased spike weight (r=0.572**) and kernel number per spike. These results showed that peduncle length had a positive effect on grain yield. Flag leaf area had a significant positive effect on the spike weight of the genotypes. Low precipitation and high temperatures from shooting up to heading stages negatively affected grain yield and yield components.

Keywords: Barley, Yield, Physiological traits, Agronomic characters

How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Ozturk, I. (2023). Yield and Yield Components in Barley Genotypes (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes under Rainfed Conditions . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 7(1), 104-114. doi: 10.29329/ijiaar.2023.536.7

Harvard
Ozturk, I. (2023). Yield and Yield Components in Barley Genotypes (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes under Rainfed Conditions . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 7(1), pp. 104-114.

Chicago 16th edition
Ozturk, Irfan (2023). "Yield and Yield Components in Barley Genotypes (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes under Rainfed Conditions ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 7 (1):104-114. doi:10.29329/ijiaar.2023.536.7.

References

Anonymous, (2010). Food F. Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2010) FAOSTAT, Agricultural production. 2013. [Google Scholar]
Berdahl, J.D., Rasmusson, D.C., and Moss, D.N. (1971). Effects of Leaf Area on Photosynthetic Rate, Light Penetration and Grain Yield in Barley. Vol. 12 No. 2, p. 177-180. doi:10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183X001200020006x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Blum, A. (1988). Improving wheat grain filling under stress by stem reserve mobilisation. Euphytica 100:77-83. [Google Scholar]
Chapagain, T., and Good, A. (2015) Yield and Production Gaps in Rainfed Wheat, Barley, and Canola in Alberta. Front. Plant Sci. 6:990. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00990. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S., and Baum, M. (2007). Participatory Plant Breeding In Water-Limited Environments. Exp Agric. 2007;43(4):411-35. [Google Scholar]
Eberhart, S.A., and Russell, W.A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop. Sci.6: 36-40 [Google Scholar]
Finlay, K.W., and Wilkinson, G.N. (1963). The Analysis of Adaptation in a Plant Breeding Programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 14: 742-754. [Google Scholar]
Dodig, D., Zoric, M., Jovic, M., Kandic, V., Stanisavljevic, R., Surlan-Momirovic, G. (2014). Wheat seedlings growth response to water deficiency and how it correlates with adult plant tolerance to drought. J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 153, 466–480. [Google Scholar]
Fischer, R.A., and Turner, N.C. (1978). Plant productivity in the arid and semiarid zones. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1978, 29, 277–317. [Google Scholar]
Fowler, C.G., & Rasmussen, D.C. (1969). Leaf Area Relationship and Inheritance in Barley. Crop Sci., 9: 729-731. [Google Scholar]
Gomez, K.A., and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed. John Willey and Sons, Inc. New York. 641. [Google Scholar]
Karamanos, A.J., and Papatheohari, A.Y. (1999). Assessment of Drought Resistance of Crop Genotypes by Means of the Water Potential Index. Crop Sci. 39:1792-1797. [Google Scholar]
Madic, M., Paunovic, A., Jelic, M., Knezevic, D., and Djurovic, D. (2012). Yield Components and Grain Quality of Winter Barley Cultivars Grown on Pseudogley. Third international Scientific Symposium "Agrosym Jahorina 2012" p: 277-281. [Google Scholar]
Öztürk, İ., Avcı, R., Tülek, A., Kaya, R., and Tuna, B. (2014). Investigation of Yield, Stability and Some Quality Traits of the Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes. Scientific Works, Vol:3, No:1 P:133-140. Breeding and Technologies of Field Crops, International Scientific Conference. 27-28 Nov.2014 Karnobat, Bulgaria [Google Scholar]
Rahim, F.P., Maria Alejandra, T.T., Víctor Manuel, Z.V., Jose Elias, T.R., and Maginot, N.H. (2021). Stomatal Traits and Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Forage Yield in Drought Conditions of Northeastern Mexico. Plants 2021, 10, 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071318 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Tambussi, E.A., Nogues, S., Ferrio, P., Voltas, J., and Araus, J.L. (2005). Does higher yield potential improve barley performance in Mediterranean conditions? A case study. Field Crop. Res. 2005, 91, 149–160. [Google Scholar]
Wang, J., Yang, J., Jia, Q., Zhu, J., Shang, Y., Hua, W., and Zhou, M. (2014). A new QTL for plant height in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) showing no negative effects on grain yield. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28; 9(2): e90144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090144. eCollection 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Zadoks, J., Chang, T., and Konzak, C. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed research 14: 415-421. [Google Scholar]

Volume 7 Issue 1

March 2023

All Articles