International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research
Abbreviation: IJIAAR | ISSN (Online): 2602-4772 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiaar

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2023, Vol. 7(1) 114-125

Flag Leaf of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes and Relation with Yield Component under Rainfed Conditions

İrfan Öztürk

pp. 114 - 125   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2023.536.8

Published online: March 29, 2023  |   Number of Views: 68  |  Number of Download: 302

Download PDF

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to assess flag leaf fresh and dry weight of advanced bread wheat genotypes and their relation with yield and yield components. A total of 25 bread wheat genotypes were tested during the 2017-2018 cycles in four locations in the Trakia region, Turkey. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete blocks design (RCBD) with four replications. Grain yield (GY), spike number per square meter (SNM), kernel number per spike (KNS), spikelet number per spike (SNS), spike weight (SW), plant height (PH), peduncle length (PL), spike length (SL), flag leaf fresh weight (FLFW), flash leaf dry weight (FLDW) were investigated. The combined ANOVA revealed significant differences among genotypes (G), environments (E) and their interaction (G×E) for grain yield (p<0.01). The highest grain yield was performed by G21 (6807 kg ha-1) and G20 (6776 kg ha-1). Both genotypes also had higher yield potential across four environments. Therefore, they were considered stable genotypes. Flag leaf fresh and dry weight in wheat genotypes positively affected spike length, spikelet number per spike, kernel number per spike and spike weight. As the plant density per unit area increased, there was a decrease in flag leaf fresh and dry weight. Increasing in the spike number per square meter negatively affected and reduced flag leaf fresh and dry weight in wheat genotypes. Results showed that spike weight, flag leaf fresh and dry weight of the wheat genotypes could be used in the selection of wheat breeding study for yield components. The longest spike, the highest number of grains per spike and the number of spikelets were determined in G17, together with the yield above the average. In addition, G17 had the highest spike weight and flag leaf fresh and dry weight. For this reason, G17 has been determined that can be used in breeding studies due to its agronomic characteristics. The results of the research showed that flag leaf dry and fresh weight could be used for yield components in wheat breeding selection under rainfed conditions.

Keywords: Bread wheat, Genotypes, Flag leaf, Yield component, Comparison

How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Ozturk, I. (2023). Flag Leaf of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes and Relation with Yield Component under Rainfed Conditions . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 7(1), 114-125. doi: 10.29329/ijiaar.2023.536.8

Harvard
Ozturk, I. (2023). Flag Leaf of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes and Relation with Yield Component under Rainfed Conditions . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 7(1), pp. 114-125.

Chicago 16th edition
Ozturk, Irfan (2023). "Flag Leaf of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes and Relation with Yield Component under Rainfed Conditions ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 7 (1):114-125. doi:10.29329/ijiaar.2023.536.8.
References
  1. Abbad, H., Jaafari, S.E.L., Bort J., and Araus J.L. (2003). Comparison of flag leaf and ear photosynthesis with biomass and grain yield of durum wheat under various water conditions and genotypes. Agronomie 24:19–28. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmadizadeh, M., Nori, A., Shahbazi, H. and Habibpour, M. (2011a). Effects of drought stress on some agronomic and morphological traits of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) landraces under greenhouse condition. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(64): 14097-14107. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmadizadeh, M., Shahbazi, H., Valizadeh, M. and Zaefizadeh, M. (2011b). Genetic diversity of durum wheat landraces using multivariate analysis under normal irrigation and rought stress conditions. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(10): 2294-2302. [Google Scholar]
  4. Borojevic, S. (1988). Genetic changes in morphophysiologic characters in relation to breeding for increased wheat yield. CSSA Spec. Publ. 13, 71-85. [Google Scholar]
  5. Carberry, P.S., Liang, W., Twomlow, S., Holzworth, D.P., Dimes, J.P. and Mc Clelland, T. (2013). Scope for improved eco-efficiency varies among diverse cropping systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 8381–8386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208050110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Chaves, M.M., and Oliveira, M.M. (2004). Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits, prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 2365-2384. [Google Scholar]
  7. Eberhart, S.A., & Russell., W.A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop. Sci.6: 36-40 [Google Scholar]
  8. Finlay, K.W., & Wilkinson, G.N. (1963). The Analysis of Adaptation in a Plant Breeding Programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 14: 742-754. [Google Scholar]
  9. Eskandari, H., and Kazemi, K. (2010). Response of different bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to post-anthesis water deficit. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 2(4): 49-52. [Google Scholar]
  10. Evans, L.T., and Rawson, M. (1970). Photosynthesis and respiration by the flag leaf and components of the ear during grain development in wheat. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 23: 245-254. [Google Scholar]
  11. Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., and Basra, S.M.A. (2009). Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for sustainable development, 29, 185-212. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fischer, R.A., Byerlee, D., and Edmeades, G.O. (2009). Can Technology Deliver on the Yield Challenge to 2050? Expert Meeting on How to Feed the World in 2050. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Economic and Social Development Department [Google Scholar]
  13. Gomez, K.A., & Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed. John Willey and Sons, Inc. New York. 641. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gupta, N.K., Gupta, S., and Kumar, A. (2001). Effect of water stress on physiological attributes and their relationship with growth and yield of wheat cultivars at different stages. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 186, 55-62. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hay, R.K.M., and Walker, A.J. (1989). An Introduction to the Physiology of Crop Yield. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, Essex, England. [Google Scholar]
  16. Khaliq, L., Irshad, A., and Ahsan, M. (2008). Awns and flag leaf contribution to grain yield in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Akadėmiai Kiadơ, cereal research communications- Journal Article, Vol. 36, No.1, pp: 65-76. [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, X., Wang, H., Li, H., Zhang, L., Teng, N., Lin, Q., Wang, J., Kuang, T., Li, Z., Li, B., Zhang, A.and Lin, J. (2006). Awns play a dominant role in carbohydrate production during the grain-filling stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Physiologia plantarum 127 (4): 701-709. [Google Scholar]
  18. Öztürk, İ. (2022). Genotypes by Environment Interaction of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes on Yield and Quality Parameters under Rainfed Conditions. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 2022, Vol. 6 (1), 27-40.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2022.434.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  19. Öztürk, İ., Avcı, R., Kahraman, T., Tülek, A. (2021). Physiological Parameters of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes and Association with Yield and Quality under Rainfed Conditions. Ekin J. 7(1):52-60. [Google Scholar]
  20. Racz, I., Hirişcău, D., Berindean, I., Kadar, R., Muntean, E., Tritean, N., Russu, F., Ona, A., and Muntean, L. (2022). The Influence of Flag Leaf Removal and Its Characteristics on Main Yield Components and Yield Quality Indices on Wheat. Agronomy. 12(10):2545.   https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  21. Reynolds, M.P., Delgado, M.I., Guterrez-Rodriguez, M., and Larque-Saavedra, A. (2000). Photosynthesis of wheat in a warm, irrigated environment. I. Genetic diversity and crop productivity. Field Crops Res. 66, 37-50. [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Ittersum, M.K., and Rabbinge, R. (1997). Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input-output combinations. Field Crop Res. 52, 197–208. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00037-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  23. Zadoks, J., Chang, T., and Konzak, C. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed research 14: 415-421. [Google Scholar]
Meta
Vol. 7 (1)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 7 Issue 1

March 2023

All Articles
Copyright © 2012 - 2024 International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research.
Pen Academic Publishing is a trademark of THDSoft.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY-NC-ND
Electronic Journal Management System. This software was developed in Türkiye. ejournal.gen.tr
Pen Academic Publishing General Publication Policy: