International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research
Abbreviation: IJIAAR | ISSN (Online): 2602-4772 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiaar

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2022, Vol. 6(2) 129-143

Turkey Jerky as a Potantial Meat Snack

Orhan Onur Aşkın, Gülce Bediş Kaynarca, Mert Solak & Mustafa Samancı

pp. 129 - 143   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2022.451.6

Published online: June 30, 2022  |   Number of Views: 9  |  Number of Download: 56


Abstract

The research was aimed to obtain a product with high nutritional value and long shelf life called as Turkey Jerky. It was produced with turkey breast meats which marinated with 7 different spices (Salvia rosmarinus (R), Thymus vulgaris (T), Pimenta racemosa (P), Origanum majorona (M), mixed spicy (MX) and control group (C)), vinegar, olive oil, soy sauce and liquid smoke. At the end of the marination, turkey breast meats were dried in the drying oven and kept in room conditions for 30 days after vacuum packaging. Microbiological, chemical, and sensory analyses were performed for treatments on the 0, 15 and 30 days. For turkey meat, the moisture, pH, ash, water activity (aw), fat and protein contents were determined as 72.34± 1.21, 5.83 ± 0.02, 1.18 ± 0.01, 0.972 ± 0.001, 1.05 ± 0.12 and 27.30 ± 0.24 %, respectively. There were significant differences in treatments all chemical properties than control samples. Salvia rosmarinus and Pimenta racemosa samples had the highest protein and ash content; Origanum majorona samples had the highest fat content. After marination, both moisture content and water activity values for all samples had decreased significantly. Otherwise, pH values had increased slightly. TBA value was found in the least control group for the beginning of the storage and the treatments had increasing effect on TBAs values. Origanum majorona samples and Pimenta racemosa samples had lower TBA values than other treatments. However, control and Origanum majorona samples have highest the differences between 0 and 30 days for TBA values. Besides, mix spicy treatment had the lowest differences for 30 days. According to the microbiaological analyses, Origanum majorona samples were the most safety treatment. For all samples, it has been observed that the microbial load increases slightly during the maintenance period. Sensory evaluation also dedicted that Origanum majorona samples had the best sensorial properties and general accaptibility.

As a result, while the increases in microbial load was not observed much compared to a product that is vacuum packed and stored in room conditions, the chemical contents of the products were generally preserved. Considering these results, the turkey jerky is an alternative healthy snack.

Keywords: Drying, marination, jerky, Turkey


How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Askin, O.O., Kaynarca, G.B., Solak, M. & Samanci, M. (2022). Turkey Jerky as a Potantial Meat Snack . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 6(2), 129-143. doi: 10.29329/ijiaar.2022.451.6

Harvard
Askin, O., Kaynarca, G., Solak, M. and Samanci, M. (2022). Turkey Jerky as a Potantial Meat Snack . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 6(2), pp. 129-143.

Chicago 16th edition
Askin, Orhan Onur, Gulce Bedis Kaynarca, Mert Solak and Mustafa Samanci (2022). "Turkey Jerky as a Potantial Meat Snack ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 6 (2):129-143. doi:10.29329/ijiaar.2022.451.6.

References
  1. Mitchell, J.A. (2017). Citation: Why is it so important. Mendeley Journal, 67(2), 81-95. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anonymous, (2018). Gıdalarda Kül Tayini, https://mobil.diatek.com.tr/Makale-Yontem/Mikrobiyolojik-Analiz/Gidalarda-Toplam-Kul-Tayini_3438.htm (Erişim Tarihi 3.5.2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. AOAC (2000). Official Methods of Analyses, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bor, Y. (2011). Hindi Etlerinin Marinasyonunda Bazı Doğal Antioksidan    Kaynakların Kullanımı. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Afyon. [Google Scholar]
  5. Carr, M.A., Miller, M.F., Daniel, D.R., Yarbrough, C.E., Petrosky, J.D. & Thompson, L.D. (2007). Evaluation of the physical, chemical and sensory properties of jerky processed from emu, beef, and turkey. Journal of Food Quality, 20(5), 419 – 425. [Google Scholar]
  6. Choi, Y., Han, D., Choi, J., Hwang, K., Song, D., Kim, H., Kim, Y. & Kim, C. (2016). Effect of chicken skin on the quality characteristics of semi-dried restructured jerky. Poultry Science, 95, 1198–1204. [Google Scholar]
  7. Çolak, H., Uğurluay, G., Nazlı, B. & Bingöl, E.B. (2011). Paketlemede Kullanılan Nem Tutucu Filtrelerin Hindi Etinin Raf Ömrü Üzerine Etkisi. İstanbul Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 37 (2), 107-116. [Google Scholar]
  8. Deniz, E.E. (2009). Kesim Sonrasında Farklı Sürelerde Enjekte Edilen Marinat Çözeltilerin Et      Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri (Doktora tezi) Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü İzmir, Türkiye. Erişim adresi: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ [Google Scholar]
  9. Frei, C.B.F., Prudencio, E.S., Amboni, R.D.M.C., Pinto, S.S., Murakami, A.N.N. & Murakami, F.S. (2012). Microencapsulation of Bifidobacteria by Spray Drying in the Presence of Prebiotics. Food Research International, 45, 306-312. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kılıç, B., Basyiğit, K. G. & Aşkın, O. (2007). Turkish Style Aromated (Ready -To-Eat) Meat Snack Production: Consumer Acceptability and Safety Evaluation. 5th               International Congress on Food Technology Proceedings, Yunanistan, Selanik, 2, 76-83. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim H., Kim K., Lee J., Kim G. & Kim C. (2012). Effects of Chicken Feet Gelatin and Wheat Fiber Levels on Quality Properties of Semi-dried Chicken Jerky. Korean J. Food Sci. An., 32, 6, 732-739. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kolsarıcı, N., Ersoy, Ü., Candoğan, K. & Üzümcüoğlu, Ü. (2004). Soğuk ve Dondurulmuş Depolamanın Mekanik Ayrılmış Tavuk Etlerinin Kimyasal ve Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesine Etkisi. Orlab On-Line Mikrobiyoloji Derg., 02, 08, 2-13. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kök, F., Özbay, G. & Muz, A. (2007). Aydın İlinde Satışa Sunulan Fermente Sucukların Mikrobiyolojik Kalitelerinin İncelenmesi. F.Ü. Sağ. Bil. Derg. 2007, 21, 6, 249 - 252. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lawless, H.T. & Heymann, H. (1999). Sensory Evaluation of Food, Principles and Practices. Editorial Services: Ruth Bloom, Library of Congress, ISBN:0-8342-1752-X, 827, Gaithersburg, Maryland. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee S. & Kang C. (2003). Effects of moisture content and drying temperature on the physicochemical properties of ostrich jerky, Nahrung/Food 47, 5, 330-333. [Google Scholar]
  16. Oblinger, J.L., Draper, C.I. & Mendenhall, V.T. (1975). Microbiological and Sensory Evaluation of a Dehydrated Turkey Meat Product. Poultry Science, 54, 91-95. [Google Scholar]
  17. Porto-Fett, A.C.S., Call, J.E., Hwang, C.A., Juneja, V., Inghan, S., Inghan, B. & Luchansky, J.B. (2009). Validation of commercial processes for inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium, and Listeria monocytogenes on the surface of whole-muscle turkey jerky. Poultry Science, 88, 1275 - 1281. [Google Scholar]
  18. Smaoui, S., Hlima, H. B., Salah, R. B. & Ghorbel, R. (2011). Effects of sodium lactate and lactic acid on chemical, microbiological and sensory characteristics of marinated chicken. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 10(54), 11317-11326. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sman R.G.M. & Boera S.E. (2005). Predicting the initial freezing point and water activity of meat products from composition data, J of Food Eng., 66, 4, 469-475. [Google Scholar]
  20. Temelli S. (2011). Geleneksel Yöntemlerle Üretilen Kurutulmuş Et Ürünleri , Uludag Univ.     J. Fac. Vet. Med., 30, 2: 61-66. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tokur, B., Korkmaz, K. & Ayas, D. (2006). Comparison of Two Thiobarbituric Acid (TBA) Method for Monitoring Lipid Oxidation in Fish, E.U. J Fish Aquat Sci, 23, 3-4, 331-334. [Google Scholar]
  22. Özenç, B. (2011). Fumaria officinalis’un Antioksidan Aktivitesinin Belirlenmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kimya Anabilim Dalı, Konya. [Google Scholar]
  23. Williams, P., Leong, W., Ingham, B. & Ingham, S. (2009). Lethality of Small-Scale Commercial Dehydrator and Smokehouse/Oven Drying Processes Against Escherichia coli O157:H7-, Salmonellaspp.-, Listeria monocytogenes-, and Staphylococcus aureus-inoculated Turkey Jerkyand the Ability of a Lactic Acid Bacterium to Serve as a Pathogen Surrogate. J Food Prot, 72(10), 2056-2064. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-72.10.2056. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. Wongwimat, P. & Wattanachant, S. (2015). Quality changes of chicken meat jerky with different sweeteners during storage, J Food Sci Technol, 52(12), 8329 - 8335. [Google Scholar]