Pen Academic Publishing
Journals • Publish with us • Publishing partnership • About Us • Türkçe
Research article | Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2024, Vol 8(4) 324-335

Influence of Effective Microorganisms and Mineral Fertilizers on Soil Biogenicity Parameters and Soybean Yield

Gorica Cvijanović • Vojin Đukić • Marija Bajagić • Zlatica Mamlić • Biljana Šević • Vojin Cvijanović • Aleksandra Ivetić
Cite this article
Article Type
Research article
Publication Date
December 31, 2024
Pages
324-335
DOI
10.29329/ijiaar.2024.1109.5

Abstract

The research aimed to determine the effect of the application of effective microorganisms (EM) on the basic microbiological parameters of soil biogenicity and the height of soybean yield. The research was conducted in the period from 2016-2018. Factor A is the years 2016-2018; factor B soybean genotype Galina, Sava, Rubin and factor C application of EM: variant 1 - control, variant 2 - EM in the soil 20 lha-1 and foliar treatment in the phase of plant development from three to four trefoils and the budonization phase, (5 lha- 1); variant 3 - NPK fertilizer (8:15:15), 300 kgha-1, and variant 4 - EM in the soil 20 lha-1 and foliar treatments in the stage of plant development from three to four trefoils and the budonization stage + NPK of 300 kgha- 1. During full flowering, the basic parameters of soil biogenicity, the total number of microorganisms (TNB), the number of azotobacter (AZB) and actinomycetes (ACT) were determined. At the end of the growing season, the grain yield was measured. The results showed that factor A had a very significant influence on all the examined traits. Application of EM had a significant impact on all investigated parameters. The parameters of soil biogenicity in Variant 4 EM+NPK were statistically significantly (p<0.01) higher than the control and Variant 3. Variant 2 had a greater number p<0.01 compared to the control, while in relation to the long varieties, the significance was p<0.05. Factor C significantly influenced the examined parameters. The highest number of all tested parameters was determined in the Rubin genotype's rhizosphere. The obtained results were compatible with the yield level. The variety Rubin had the highest grain yield of 4105.03 kgha-1. Variant 2 with EM increased the yield by 13.29% compared to the control, which was at the level (p<0.05), and with the application of EM+NPK variant 4, the yield was higher by 15.95%, which was at the (p<0.01) level of significance.

Keywords: Effective Microorganisms Soybean Soil Biogenicity Yield
Cite this article
Cvijanović, G., Đukić, V., Bajagić, M., Mamlić, Z., Šević, B., Cvijanović, V., & Ivetić, A. (2024). Influence of Effective Microorganisms and Mineral Fertilizers on Soil Biogenicity Parameters and Soybean Yield. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 8(4), 324-335. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2024.1109.5

  • Cinnadurai, C., Gopalaswamy, G., & Balachandar, D. (2013). Diversity of cultivable Azotobacter in the semi-arid alfisol receiving long-term organic and inorganic nutrient amendments. Ann Microbiol, l 63, 1397-1404. [Google Scholar]
  • Cho, H.K., & Koyama, A. (1997). Korean natural farming: indigenous microorganisms and vital power of crop/livestock. Korean Natural Farming [Google Scholar]
  • Cvijanović, G., Milošević, N., & Jarak, M. (2007). The Importance of Diazotrophs as Biofertilisers in the Maize and Soybean Production. Genetika - Genetics, 39 (3), 395 [Google Scholar]
  • Cvijanović, G., Đurić, N., Marinković, J., Đukić, V., Dozet, G., Petrović, G., & Cvijanović, M. (2017). The influence of different ways of feeding wheat on rhizosphere microflora and wheat yield. Proceedings of the PKB Agroeconomics Institute, 23(1-2), 95-104. [Google Scholar]
  • Fehr, W.R. & Caviness, C.E. (1977). Stages of soybean development. Iowa Agric. and Home Econ. Exp. Stn. Spec. Rep. 80. [Google Scholar]
  • Higa T. (1991). Effective microorganisms: A biotechnology for mankind.p. 8-14. In J.F. Parr, S.B. Hornick, and C.E. Whitman (ed.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Higa, T. & Wididana, G.N. (1991). Changes in the soil microflora induced by Effective Microorganisms., 153-162. In J.F. Parr, S.B. Hornick, and C.E. Whitman. (ed.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming. U.S. Department of Agriculture, [Google Scholar]
  • Higa, T. (2001). Effective Microorganisms in the context of Kyusei Nature Farming: a technology for the future. Paper presented at: Sixth International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming Pretoria, South Africa. [Google Scholar]
  • Himangini, J., Somduttand, Piyush, C., & Mundr, S.L. (2019). Role of Effective Microorganisms (EM) in Sustainable Agriculture Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci, 8(3), 172-181. [Google Scholar]
  • Goessler, W. & Kuehenelt, D. (2002). Analytical methods for the determination of arsenic and arsenic compounds in the environment. In: William T, Frankenberger Jr, 27-50. [Google Scholar]
  • Jahanban, L. & Lotfifar, O. (2012). Study of the effective organism (EM) application effect on efficacy of chemical and organic fertilizers in corn cultivation (Zea maizs. C704). Plant Production Technology, 11, 43-52. [Google Scholar]
  • Javaid, A. (2006). Foliar application of effective microorganisms on pea as an alternative fertilizer. Agron Sustain Dev, 26, 257–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Javaid, A., Bajwa, R., Rabbani, N., & Uzma, M. (2000). EM and VAM Technology in Pakistan. IX: Effect of EM application on growth, yield, nodulation and VA mycorrhizal colonization in Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek. Pak J Biol Sci, 3, 694-698. [Google Scholar]
  • Kim, J.K. & Lee, B.K. (2000). Mass production of Rhodopseudomonas palustris as diet for aquaculture. Aquacult Eng, 23, 281-293. [Google Scholar]
  • Ranjith, N.K., Sasikala, C., & Ramana, C.V. (2007). Catabolism of l-phenylalanine and l-tyrosine by Rhodobacter sphaeroides OU5 occurs through 3, 4- dihydroxyphenylalanine. Res. Microbiol., 158, 506–511. [Google Scholar]
  • Martinez-Romero, E. & Caballero-Mellado, J. (1996). Rhizobium phylogenies and bacterial genetic diversity. Critical Rev. Plant Sci., 15, 113-140. [Google Scholar]
  • Moulin, L., Munive, A., Dreyfus, B., & Boivin-Masson, C. (2001). Nodulation of legumes by members of the beta-subclass of Proteobacteria. Nature, 411: 948–950 [Google Scholar]
  • Murugan, R. & Kumar, S. (2013). Influence of long-term fertilisation and crop rotation on changes in fungal and bacterial residues in a tropical ricefield soil. Biol Fertil Soils, 49, 847-856. [Google Scholar]
  • Priyadi, K., Hadi, A., Siagian, T.H., Nisa, C., Azizah, A., Raihani, N., and Inubushi, K. (2005). Effect of soil type, applications of chicken manure and effective microorganisms on corn yield and microbial properties of acidic wetland soils in Indonesia. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition 51, 689-691. [Google Scholar]
  • Sabeti, Z., Armin, M., & Vaezi, K.M.R. (2017). Investigation of effective microorganisms application method on alleviation of salt stress effects on root morphology of sweet corn. Farming and vegetable growing, 54(2), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.5937/ratpov54-12469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  • Sangakkara, U.R. & Higa, T. (1994). Effect of EM on the growth and yield of selected food crops in Sri Lanka. In: Parr JF, Homick SB, Simpson ME (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming, USDA, Washington, DC, 118–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Sun, P.F., Fang, W.T., Shin, L.Y., Wei, J.Y., Fu, S.F., & Chou, J.Y. (2014). Indole-3- Acetic Acid-producing yeasts in the phyllosphere of the carnivorous plant Drosera indica L. Plos one 9(12), e114196, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  • Xiaohou, S., Diyou, L., Liang, Z., Hu, W., & Hui, W. (2001). Use of EM-tech-nology in agriculture and environmental management in China, Nat. Farm. Environ. 2, 9-18. [Google Scholar]