International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research
Abbreviation: IJIAAR | ISSN (Online): 2602-4772 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiaar

Research article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2025, Vol. 9(4) 454-474

Evaluation of Some Properties of Artvin/Yusufeli/Erenköy Soils and Farm Fertiliziers Used in the Region by Laboratory and Greenhouse Experiments

Pınar Başıbüyük, Nesrin Yıldız

pp. 454 - 474   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2025.1375.13

Publish Date: December 17, 2025  |   Single/Total View: 0/0   |   Single/Total Download: 0/0

PDF Download

Abstract

Sustainable crop production depends on proper soil management and nutrient supplementation. This study assessed the physical and chemical properties of soils in Erenköy village, Yusufeli district, Artvin province, characterized commonly used animal manures, and evaluated their effects on plant growth under controlled greenhouse conditions. Soil samples from 26 locations were analyzed for pH, electrical conductivity (EC), organic matter, lime content, macro- and micronutrients. Eight manure samples including fermented and unfermented cattle and goat manures were analyzed for pH, EC, organic matter, moisture, and nutrient composition. A greenhouse experiment was conducted with rye (Secale cereale L., Aslım-95) using a completely randomized design. Fermented cattle and goat manures were applied at 5% (w/w) to 200 g soil pots in triplicate, and plant growth, dry weight, and total nitrogen content were recorded after 21 days. Soils were slightly to moderately alkaline (average pH 8.11), very slightly saline (EC 0.38 dS m⁻¹), moderately calcareous, and exhibited very high organic matter. Mg, K, total nitrogen, and inorganic N (NH₄⁺, NO₃⁻) were high, Ca and P sufficient, and Na within normal range. Micronutrients Mn, Fe, and Cu were adequate, while Zn was elevated. Soil textures were mainly sandy loam and sandy clay loam. Manures were moderately alkaline, slightly to moderately saline, high in organic matter (40–84%), low in moisture (~4.5%), rich in K, Ca, and Mg, deficient in P, and elevated in Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn. Application of fermented manures significantly increased plant nitrogen content and dry weight compared to control (p<0.001), with average dry weights of 1.66 g/pot (control), 1.51 g/pot (goat manure), and 1.61 g/pot (cattle manure). The results highlight the potential of fermented animal manures to enhance soil fertility and sustainable crop production in the region.

Keywords: Soil analysis, Plant analysis, Farmyard manure analysis, Soil fertility

How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Basibuyuk, P., & Yildiz, N. (2025). Evaluation of Some Properties of Artvin/Yusufeli/Erenköy Soils and Farm Fertiliziers Used in the Region by Laboratory and Greenhouse Experiments. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 9(4), 454-474. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2025.1375.13

Harvard
Basibuyuk, P. and Yildiz, N. (2025). Evaluation of Some Properties of Artvin/Yusufeli/Erenköy Soils and Farm Fertiliziers Used in the Region by Laboratory and Greenhouse Experiments. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 9(4), pp. 454-474.

Chicago 16th edition
Basibuyuk, Pinar and Nesrin Yildiz (2025). "Evaluation of Some Properties of Artvin/Yusufeli/Erenköy Soils and Farm Fertiliziers Used in the Region by Laboratory and Greenhouse Experiments". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 9 (4):454-474. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2025.1375.13
References
  1. Aksu, T. (2017). Farklı azot ve çiftlik gübre dozlarının ekmeklik buğdayda (Triticum aestivum L.) verim, kalite ve antioksidan aktivitesi üzerine etkisi (Yüksek lisans tezi). Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Aydın. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alparslan, M. A., & İnal, A. (1998). Deneme tekniği (Ders kitabı no: 1501). Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Toprak Bölümü. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anonim. (2020). Yusufeli coğrafyası. https://www.yusufeli.bel.tr/yusufeli-cografyasi [Google Scholar]
  4. Anonim. (2021). Gübrelerin sınıflandırılması. http://www.tarimkutuphanesi.com [Google Scholar]
  5. Aşık, B. B., & Katkat, A. V. (2018). Topraklarda organik madde kaynağı olarak atıksu arıtma çamurlarının kullanım olanakları. Organomineral Gübre Çalıştayı, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayu, W., Rethman, N. F. G., Hammes, P. S., & Alemu, G. (2006). Effects of farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizers on sorghum growth, yield, and nitrogen use in a semi-arid area of Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 29(2), 391–407. [Google Scholar]
  7. Beşirli, G., Sönmez, İ., Keçeci, M., & Güçdemir, İ. (2010). Organik ıspanak üretiminde farklı bitki besin maddesi uygulamalarının toprak yapısı üzerine etkileri. Türkiye IV. Organik Tarım Sempozyumu, Erzurum. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bouyoucos, G. J. (1951). A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 43, 434–438. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bremner, J. M. (1965). Nitrogen availability indexes. In C. A. Black (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties (pp. 1324–1345). American Society of Agronomy. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bremner, J. M., & Mulvaney, C. S. (1982). Nitrogen—Total. In A. L. Page et al. (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties (2nd ed., pp. 595–624). American Society of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c31 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Debosz, K., Petersen, S. O., Kure, L. K., & Ambus, P. (2002). Evaluating effects of sewage sludge and household compost on soil physical, chemical and microbiological properties. Applied Soil Ecology, 19, 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00191-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  12. Düzgüneş, N., Allen, T. M., Fedor, J., & Papahadjopoulos, D. (1987). Lipid mixing during membrane aggregation and fusion: Why fusion assays disagree. Biochemistry, 26(25), 8435–8442. [Google Scholar]
  13. El-Samnoudi, I. M., et al. (2019). Combined effects of poultry manure and soil mulching on soil properties, physiological responses, yield, and water use efficiency of sorghum under water stress. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 50(20), 2626–2639. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2019.1671445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Eyüpoğlu, F. (2002). Türkiye gübre gereksinimi, tüketimi ve geleceği. Köy Hizmetleri Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  15. FAO. (1990). Micronutrient assessment at the country level. Food and Agriculture Organization. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gezgin, S. (2018). Türkiye topraklarının organik madde durumu, organik madde kaynaklarımız ve kullanımı. Organomineral Gübre Çalıştayı, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  17. İşçioğlu, M. (2019). Erenköy. Beşiz Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kacar, B., & İnal, A. (2008). Bitki analizleri. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kacar, B., & Kütük, C. (2010). Gübre analizleri. Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kacar, B. (2012). Toprak analizleri (3. bs.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lindsay, W. L., & Norvell, W. A. (1969). Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 33, 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, S., et al. (2017). Spatiotemporal patterns of enzyme activities after fertilization reflect niche differentiation mechanisms between plants and microorganisms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 112, 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.05.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  23. McLean, E. O. (1982). Soil pH and lime requirement. In A. L. Page et al. (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis (pp. 199–224). American Society of Agronomy. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mordoğan, N., Ceylan, Ş., Delibacak, S., Çakıcı, H., Günen, E., Pekcan, T., & Çolak, B. (2013). Gübrelemenin zeytin yetiştirilen kumlu-tınlı topraktaki besin element içeriğine etkisi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nelson, R. E. (1982). Carbonate and gypsum. In A. L. Page et al. (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis (pp. 181–197). American Society of Agronomy. [Google Scholar]
  26. Olsen, S. R., & Sommers, L. E. (1982). Phosphorus. In A. L. Page et al. (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis (pp. 403–430). American Society of Agronomy. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ren, F., et al. (2019). Changes in soil microbial biomass after fertilizer application in cropping systems: A meta-analysis. Soil and Tillage Research, 194, 104291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.06.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Rhoades, J.D., (1982). Exchangeable cations. methods of soil analysis part2. chemical and microbiological properties second edition. Agronamy, 9 (2), 159-164. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sağlam, M. T. (2012). Toprak ve suyun kimyasal analiz yöntemleri. Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  30. SAS Institute. (2022). SAS online documentation 9.4. https://documentation.sas.com [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun, F., Littlejohn, D., & Gibson, M. D. (1998). Ultrasonication extraction and solid-phase extraction cleanup for determination of PAHs in soils. Analytica Chimica Acta, 364(1–3), 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  32. Taban, S., Turan, M.A., & Katkat, A.V. (2013). Tarımda organik madde ve tavuk gübresi. Tavukçulu karaştırma Dergisi,10, 9-13. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tamer, N., & Namlı, A., (2018). Kimyasal gübre yerine kullanılabilecek doğal toprak katkı materyalleri ile tarımsal üretim olasılıkları. Organomineral Gübre Çalıştayı, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tisdale, S. L. & Nelson, W. L. (1982). Toprak verimliliği ve gübreler. (3. Baskı). Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 168. Ders Kitabı No:13, (Çeviren: Nuri Güzel). Adana [Google Scholar]
  35. TOVEP (1991). Türkiye toprakları verimlilik envanteri. T.C. Tarım ve Orman Köy İşleri Bakanlığı, Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü. [Google Scholar]
  36. Walkley, A., & Black, L.A. (1934). An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 39:29-38. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yetgin, A. (2010). Organik gübreler ve önemi. Çiftçi Eğitimi ve Yayım Şubesi, Samsun. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yıldız, N. (2012). Bitki beslemenin esasları ve bitkilerde beslenme bozukluğu belirtileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, S 477, Erzurum. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yıldız, N. (2018). Mineral gübrelerin toprak ekosistemi, çevre ve bitkisel üretim üzerine olası etkileri. Organomineral Gübre Çalıştayı, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yıldız, N., Öztürk, A., Bulut, S. Ve Karaoğlu M.M., 2012. Organic Manures And Non-Chemical Weed Control On Wheat: I-Plant Growth And Grain Yield. Journal Of Agrıculturalscıences,Cilt.18,S.9‐20. https://doi.org/10.1501/tarimbil_0000001188. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  41. Zhang, Y., Li, C., Wang, Y., Hu, Y., Christie, P., Zhang, J., & Li, X. (2016). Maize yield and soil fertility with combined use of compost and inorganic fertilizers on a calcareous soil on the north China. Plant Soil And Tillage Research, 155, 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.08.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
Meta
Vol. 9 (4)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 9 Issue 4

December 2025

All Manuscript
Copyright © 2025 International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research.
Pen Academic Publishing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY-NC-ND
All elements of this website were created using the BOQ™ - Intelligent Webverse System.
Pen Academic Publishing General Publication Policy: