International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research
Abbreviation: IJIAAR | ISSN (Online): 2602-4772 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiaar

Research article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2025, Vol. 9(2) 93-109

Exposure of Operators to Pesticides in Pesticide Application with Backpack Sprayer

Rawa Mohammed, Hüseyin Duran

pp. 93 - 109   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2025.1321.4

Publish Date: June 30, 2025  |   Single/Total View: 0/0   |   Single/Total Download: 0/0


Abstract

Today, the importance of safe and sufficient food supply for human health is increasing day by day. In herbal production, it is tried to prevent the losses of plants due to harmful organisms. Incorrect and excessive use of pesticides in the chemical control method preferred by farmers causes negative risks in terms of human health, food safety and the environment. Studies have shown that the pesticides exposed by the applicators are higher in the backpack sprayers, which are preferred due to the differences in agricultural areas and geographical structure.

In this study, pesticide residue values that operators are exposed to in applications with backpack sprayers were investigated. For this purpose, the classical backpack sprayer has been modified by adding a boom. In the applications made with this backpack sprayer, the pesticide values that the applicator was exposed to were determined in terms of volume median diameter (µm), droplet density (droplets/cm2) and surface coverage (%). In addition, the same evaluations were made in the target areas applied. Hollow cone nozzle N2 (8002), which is currently in use, and air induction nozzle N1 (IDK 120-02) nozzle type, which can be an alternative, were used in the experiment. The experiments were carried out in two nozzle types at two different forward (walking) speeds S1: 1 m/s and S2: 1.5 m/s) in field conditions. In the applications, the application rate was taken as 20 lt/da, the spray pressure (3 bar) and the spray height (50 cm) were taken as constant. In the applications, sampling surfaces were placed on the operator's body (head, chest, arms, legs) and on the target wedges. The volume median diameter, droplet density and surface coverage on the operator and target surfaces were investigated. Water sensitive papers were used as sampling surfaces, and the image processing program UTHSCSA (Image Tool for Windows V3) was used in the analysis of the gates. Obtained results were evaluated by statistical analysis.

On the operator's body, N2 × S2 with 52.85 µm for volume median diameter, N1 × S2 for surface coverage 0.24 % and N1 × S2 with 109 droplets/cm2 for droplet density can be selected. On the target surface, M2 × H1 with a volume median diameter of 356.73 µm, N2 × S1 for surface coverage and N1 × S2 for droplet density can be selected. In this study, it was concluded that the modified backpack sprayer can be used by reducing the risk for the operator.

Keywords: Backpack Sprayers, Pesticide, Exposure to Pesticide, Operator, Water Sensitive Paper, Environment


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Mohammed, R., & Duran, H. (2025). Exposure of Operators to Pesticides in Pesticide Application with Backpack Sprayer. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 9(2), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2025.1321.4

Harvard
Mohammed, R. and Duran, H. (2025). Exposure of Operators to Pesticides in Pesticide Application with Backpack Sprayer. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 9(2), pp. 93-109.

Chicago 16th edition
Mohammed, Rawa and Huseyin Duran (2025). "Exposure of Operators to Pesticides in Pesticide Application with Backpack Sprayer". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 9 (2):93-109. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2025.1321.4

References
  1. Alheidary, M.H.R. (2019). Influenceof nozzle type, workıng pressure,and theır ınteractıonon dropletsqualıtyusıng knapsack sprayer. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences: 50(3):857-866. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anonymous (2023). http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1001 (accessed date: May 3, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  3. Anonymous. (2008). Zirai Mücadele Teknik Talimatları. Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı Yayınları Cilt 4. Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  4. Anonymous. (2022). Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO), http://www.fao.org/site (accessed date: October 10, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  5. Çelen İ. H. (1998). Yelpaze hüzmeli püskürtme memelerinde aşınmanın pülverizasyon karakteristiklerine etkisi üzerine bir arastırma. Doktora Tezi, Tekirdağ Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Edirne, Türkiye, ss: 105 s. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cerruto, E., Manetto G., Santoro F. & Pascuzzi, S. (2018). Operator dermal exposure to pesticides in tomato and strawberry greenhouses from hand-held sprayers. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2273. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dafsari R. A, Yu S, Choi Y, & Lee J. (2021). Effect of geometrical parameters of air-induction nozzles on droplet characteristics and behaviour. Biosystems Engin, 209: 14-29. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dengeru, Y., Ramasamy, K., Allimuthu, S., Balakrishnan, S., Kumar, A. P. M., Kannan, B., & Karuppasami, K. M. (2022). Study on spray deposition and drift characteristics of UAV agricultural sprayer for application of insecticide in redgram crop (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.). Agronomy, 12(12), 3196. [Google Scholar]
  9. de Graaf, L., Bresson, M., Boulanger, M., Bureau, M., Lecluse, Y., Lebailly, P., & Baldi, I. (2024). Pesticide exposure in greenspaces: Comparing field measurement of dermal contamination with values predicted by registration models. Science of the Total Environment, 919, 170816. [Google Scholar]
  10. Duran, H. (2002). Samsun ili’nde mısır ekim alanlarında yabancı ot ilaçlama tekniklerinin iyileştirilmesi olanakları üzerinde bir araştırma. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 67, Samsun. [Google Scholar]
  11. Felkers, E., Kuster, C. J., Hamacher, G., Anft, T., & Kohler, M. (2024). Pesticide exposure of operators during mixing and loading a drone: towards a stratified exposure assessment. Pest Management Science. [Google Scholar]
  12. Illyassou, K.M., Adamou, R. & Schiffers, B. (2019). Exposure assessment of operators to pesticides in kongou, a sub-watershed of Niger. River Valley. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B -Pestic. Food Contam. Agric. Wastes 2019, 54, 176–186. [Google Scholar]
  13. Konthonbut, P., Kongtip, P., Nankongnab, N., Tipayamongkholgul, M., Yoosook, W. & Woskie, S. (2020). Paraquat exposure of backpack sprayers in agricultural area in Thailand. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 26(10), 2798-2811. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuster, C. J., Kluxen, F. M., Felkers, E., Morgan, N., Hewitt, N. J., & Durand-Reville, J. (2024). Efficiency of working coveralls and chemical resistant gloves in reducing operator exposure to pesticides. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, 19(2), 155-164. [Google Scholar]
  15. Machado N, J.G., Matuo, T. & Matuo, Y.K. (1998). Efficiency of safety measures applied to a manual knapsack sprayer for paraquat application to maize (Zea mays L.). Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 35, 698–701. [Google Scholar]
  16. Özyurt H B, Duran H, & Çelen İ H. (2022). Determination of the application parameters of spraying drones for crop production in hazelnut orchards. J Tekirdag Agri Fac, 19(4): 819-828. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sehsah, E.M.E. and Kleisinger, S. (2009). Study of some parameters affecting spray distribution uniformity patteren. Misr J. Ag. Eng., 26 (1), 69-93. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tudi, M., Li, H., Li, H., Wang, L., Lyu, J., Yang, L., Tong, S., Jimmy Y. Q., Ruan, H. D., Atabila, A., Phung, D. T., Sadler, R. & Connell, D. (2022). Exposure routes and health risks associated with pesticide application. Toxics 2022, 10, 335. [Google Scholar]
  19. Turgut E, Duran H. (2025). Determination of some spraying characteristics of different air induction nozzles. BSJ Agri, 8(2): 263-269. [Google Scholar]
  20. Turgut E. (2021). Farklı hava emişli meme tiplerinin bazı pülverizasyon karakteristiklerinin belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarım Makinaları ve Teknolojileri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı, Samsun, Türkiye, ss: 62. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vitali, M., Protano, C., Del Monte, A., Ensabella, F., & Guidotti, M. (2009). Operative modalities and exposure to pesticides during open field treatments among a group of agricultural subcontractors. Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 57, 193-202. [Google Scholar]
  22. Xuehua, A., Xinju, L., Jinhua, J., Lu, L., Feidi, W., Shenggan, W., & Xueping., Z. (2020). Exposure risks to pesticide applicators posed by the use ofelectric backpack sprayers and stretcher-mounted sprayersin orchards. Uman and Ecologıcal Risk Assessment: an International Journal. Vol. 26, No. 8, 2288–2301. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang, K., Zhang, W., Gao, H., Pan, X., Wu, X., Xu, J., & Dong, F. (2024). New Insights into Occupational Exposure and Risk Assessment of Nanopesticides and Conventional Pesticides for Agricultural Workers. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology, 5(1), 128-137. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhu H, Salyani M, & Fox R D. (2011). A portable scanning system for evaluation of spray deposit distribution. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 76(1), 38-43. [Google Scholar]