International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research
Abbreviation: IJIAAR | ISSN (Online): 2602-4772 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiaar

Research article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2025, Vol. 9(1) 17-31

Characterisation of Yam Production Systems, Production Constraints, and Factors Impacting Conservation among Farmers in Mbam and Inoubou Division of Cameroon

Egoume Guissana Antoine, Beyegue Honoré, Marie Amperes Bedıne Boat, Jean Pierre Mvondo-Awono

pp. 17 - 31   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2025.1294.2

Publish Date: March 31, 2025  |   Single/Total View: 9/8   |   Single/Total Download: 11/10


Abstract

Yam cultivation is practiced in all agro-ecological zones in Cameroon, but the absence of a gene bank contributes to the low level of yam production. This study aimed to characterise the production systems, highlight production constraints, collect cultivars for characterisation, and determine the factors for conserving genetic diversity in Mbam and Inoubou sub-division. The results show that yam producers in Mbam and Inoubou are gradually moving towards an intensive cropping system using fertilizers and pesticides. However, subsistence yam cultivation without the use of fertilizers and pesticides is still maintained by the majority of producers. The main production constraints for Mbam and Inoubou producers are pests, laborious cultivation, diseases, climatic hazards, lack of seeds, and soil infertility. Six factors significantly (P ˂ 0.05) affect the conservation of yam diversity. The cultivation of yams known as yellow loop, sweet white loop, and purple loop positively influences conservation. In addition, producers who stopped their study in secondary school tended to conserve the cultivars. Conversely, pest damage leads producers to reduce the number of cultivars. Similarly, producers who grow yams for food and cultural needs or for food, economic, and cultural needs have cultivar preferences and reduce yam biodiversity. The biodiversity of yams is decreasing as 48% of the producers have reduced the number of cultivars they had at the beginning of the crop. It is therefore urgent to establish a gene bank so that producers are no longer the sole custodians of biodiversity.

Keywords: Yam production, Production systems, Production constraints, Genetic diversity, Conservation.


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Antoine, E.G., Honoré, B., Boat, M.A.B., & Mvondo-Awono, J.P. (2025). Characterisation of Yam Production Systems, Production Constraints, and Factors Impacting Conservation among Farmers in Mbam and Inoubou Division of Cameroon. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 9(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2025.1294.2

Harvard
Antoine, E., Honoré, B., Boat, M. and Mvondo-Awono, J. (2025). Characterisation of Yam Production Systems, Production Constraints, and Factors Impacting Conservation among Farmers in Mbam and Inoubou Division of Cameroon. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 9(1), pp. 17-31.

Chicago 16th edition
Antoine, Egoume Guissana, Beyegue Honoré, Marie Amperes Bedine Boat and Jean Pierre Mvondo-Awono (2025). "Characterisation of Yam Production Systems, Production Constraints, and Factors Impacting Conservation among Farmers in Mbam and Inoubou Division of Cameroon". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 9 (1):17-31. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2025.1294.2

References
  1. Adegun, M.K. 2020, Comparison of the growth and economic values of maize and yam peel based supplement fed to West African dwarf rams. Journal of. Animal. Science and. Livestook. Prod. 4, 2. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adifon FH, Yabi I, Vissoh P, Balogoun I, Dossou J, Saïdou A. 2019. Écologie, systèmes de culture et utilisations alimentaires des ignames en Afrique tropicale : synthèse bibliographique. Cah. Agric. 28: 22. [Google Scholar]
  3. Atieno V., Gatheri G. W., Kamau J. W. and Muthini M. 2020. Morphological and molecular characterization of cultivated yam (Dioscorea species) in selected counties in Kenya. African Journal of Plant Science 14(7):270-279. [Google Scholar]
  4. Azeteh N. I., Hanna R., Nekongo S. P., Achiangia P. N., and Lava K. P. 2019. Yam (Dioscorea spp.) production trends in Cameroon: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research. Vol. 14 (26), pp. 1097-1110. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bazile D. et Soumare. M. 2004. Gestion spatiale de la diversité variétale en réponse à la diversité écosystémique : le cas du sorgho (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) au Mali. Évolution des pratiques et dynamique des territoires 13 : 480 - 487. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhattacharjee, R., M. Gedil, A. Sartie, E. Otoo, D. Dumet, H. Kikuno, P.L. Kumar, and R. Asiedu. 2011. “Dioscorea.” In Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources, edited by C. Kole, 71–96. Industrial Crops, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21102-7_4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  7. Campilan D. et Prain. G. 2005. Utilisation des connaissances locales pour conserver la diversité de la patate douce aux Philippines. In Conservation et utilisation durable de la biodiversité agricole. Guide de référence 1: 83 - 88 . [Google Scholar]
  8. Coursey DG. 1976. The origins and domestication of yams in Africa. In: Harlan JR, de Wet JMJ, Stemler ABL. (Eds.), Origins of African plant domestication. Monton, Hague pp. 383-403. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dansi A, Dantsey-Barry H, Dosou-Aminon I, N’kpenu EK, Agre A P, Sunu YD, Kombate K, Loko YL, Dansi M, Assogba P, Vodouhe R. 2013. Varietal diversity and genetic erosion of cultivated yams (Dioscorea cayenensis Poir – D. rotundata Lam complex and D. alata L.) in Togo. International Journal of Biodiversity Conservation 5(4):223-239. [Google Scholar]
  10. Egah J., Baco M. N., Moumouni I. M. et Nouatin G. S. 2013. Les paysans maintiennent-ils la biodiversité dans un contexte de changement climatique ? une étude de cas de l’igname au nord-bénin. Agronomie Africaine 25 (3) : 285 – 297. [Google Scholar]
  11. Egah J., Baco N., M. et Moumouni I. 2012. Dynamique de gestion de la biodiversité d’igname face au développement du vivrier marchand au nord-Bénin. VertigO, 12(3). [Google Scholar]
  12. FAOSTAT. 2019. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/fr/#data. On 14 June 2024 [Google Scholar]
  13. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAOSTAT). Statistics, Rome, Italy. Available online: www.fao.org/statistics/en (accessed on 19 January 2023) [Google Scholar]
  14. Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. 2019. An R Companion to Applied Regression, Third edition Sage, Thousand Oaks CA. https://s ocia lscie nces.mcmas ter. ca/ jfox/ Books/ Compa nion [Google Scholar]
  15. Lyonga SN (1976). Production investigation on edible yams (Dioscorea spp.) in the Western and Northwestern highland savannah zone of the United Republic of Cameroon. PhD Thesis, University of Ibadan 298 p. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lyonga SN. 1976. Production investigation on edible yams (Dioscorea spp.) in the Western and Northwestern highland savannah zone of the United Republic of Cameroon. PhD Thesis, University of Ibadan 298 p. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ngassam SB, Malaa DK, Ngome TP, Aighewi A.B. 2007. Analyse diagnostique des circuits de commercialisation de l’igname au Cameroun : atouts et contraintes. In : Nkamleu B, Annang Bacco D. N.M. 2009. Securing livelihoods through yams (SLTY); Proceedings of a Technical Workshop on the Progress in Yam Research for Development in West and Central Africa held in Accra Ghana, 11-13th September 2007. IFAD TAG 704, IITA, Nigeria, pp. 79-94. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ngeve JM. 1998. L’igname au Cameroun : contraintes de production, acquis de la recherche et perspective pour l’avenir. In : Berthaud N, Bricas N, Marchand JL. (Eds.), L’igname, plante séculaire et culture d’avenir. Acte du Séminaire International Cirad-Inra-Orstrom-Coraf. Azeteh et al. 11093-6 Juin 1997, Montpellier, France pp. 401-407. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ngue-Bissa T, Mbairanodji A, Njualem DK. 2007. Technical guide for the production and conservation of yams (Dioscorea spp.). PNDRT, Yaoundé, Cameroon 33 p. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nweke, F. I. 2016. Yam in West Africa: Food, Money and More. East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Obidiegwu, J.E.; Lyons, J.B.; Chilaka, A.C. 2020. The Dioscorea Genus (Yam)—An appraisal of nutritional and therapeutic potentials. Foods, 9, 1304. [Google Scholar]
  22. Oksanen, J. 2019. Vegan : Community Ecology Package R package version 25-6. https:// cran.r- proje ct. org/ package= vegan. [Google Scholar]
  23. Perrot N., Gonne S. et Mathieu B. sd : Biodiversité et usages alimentaires des sorghos muskuwaari au nord-Cameroun. 15 p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Villeneuve C. 2005. Vivre les changements climatiques. Conférence au CEGEP de Ste-Foy du 20 octobre 2005. Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Département des sciences fondamentales. 42 p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Xie, Y. 2020. knitr: A General-Purpose Package for Dynamic Report Generation in R. R package version 129. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zoundjihékpon J., Dansi A., Mignouna J. H., Kouakou A. M., zongo J., N'Kpènou K. E., Camara F., Kourouma S., Sanou H., Bélem J. Oossou R., Vernier P., Dumont R.Y., Hamon P. et TioTouré B.Y. 1997. Gestion des ressources génétiques des ignames africaines et conservation in situ. Aménagement et nature 135 : 85-93. [Google Scholar]