International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research
Abbreviation: IJIAAR | ISSN (Online): 2602-4772 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiaar

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2024, Vol. 8(4) 366-377

Determination of the Water Footprint of Quinoa Under Nevşehir Conditions

Mualla Keten Gokkus

pp. 366 - 377   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2024.1109.8

Publish Date: December 31, 2024  |   Single/Total View: 22  |  Single/Total Download: 22


Abstract

Quinoa is an annual crop known for its resistance to various stress factors such as drought, frost, salinity and high radiation. However, its high protein content and antioxidant properties make quinoa an important human food. Nevşehir does not have a very high potential considering its climate and water resources. The region receives an average annual rainfall of 300-400 mm. This makes it impossible to grow the majority of crops with rainfall alone. Irrigation is necessary in most cases. However, insufficient water resources and low water quality limit irrigation. The main crops grown in Nevsehir (wheat, potatoes, dry beans, dried beans, and pumpkin) are crops that need irrigation. The agricultural production potential of the region can be increased with an efficient irrigation and plant diversity planning. In this sense, quinoa is a plant with high potential for Nevşehir. Quinoa cultivation can be beneficial in irrigated or marginal agricultural areas of Nevşehir. The amount of land suitable for agriculture but not used in Nevşehir is 234 455 decares. In this study, it was investigated how much water footprint the cultivation of quinoa in Nevşehir conditions would cause. For this purpose, the amount of land that is suitable for agriculture and cannot be used in Nevşehir was considered as quinoa cultivation area. In the study, the green and blue water footprint of quinoa was calculated. The amount of water required to produce 1 ton of quinoa in Nevşehir was found to be 1575 m3 ton-1. As a result, the total water footprint of quinoa was determined as 110 900 m3. The fact that quinoa has a low water requirement and water footprint in Nevşehir compared to other crops suggests that its cultivation in the region would be beneficial. Currently, there are no studies on the cultivation of quinoa in Nevsehir and it is not produced by producers. This study has shown that the production of quinoa in Nevsehir would be very productive for marginal and arid fields in the region. Quinoa cultivation is recommended for producers in the region.

Keywords: Green Water Footprint, Blue Water Footprint, Effective Rain, Virtual Water Content, Cropwat


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Gokkus, M.K. (2024). Determination of the Water Footprint of Quinoa Under Nevşehir Conditions. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 8(4), 366-377. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2024.1109.8

Harvard
Gokkus, M. (2024). Determination of the Water Footprint of Quinoa Under Nevşehir Conditions. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 8(4), pp. 366-377.

Chicago 16th edition
Gokkus, Mualla Keten (2024). "Determination of the Water Footprint of Quinoa Under Nevşehir Conditions". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 8 (4):366-377. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2024.1109.8

References
  1. Anonymous. (2024). August 2021 BREFING. Nevşehir Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry. Access address: https://nevsehir.tarimorman.gov.tr/Belgeler/A%C4%9Fustos%202021%20BR%C4%B0F%C4%B0NG.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 25 Ağustos 2024. [Google Scholar]
  2. Avanoz, Z. (2020). Calculation of water footprint of crop production in Turkey (Master thesis). Batman University, Institute of Science and Technology, p:92. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bazile, D., & Baudron, F. (2015). The dynamics of the global expansion of quinoa growing in view of its high biodiversity. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhargava, A., Shukla, S., & Ohri, D. (2007). Genetic variability and interrelationship among various morphological and quality traits in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Field Crops Research, 101(1), 104-116. [Google Scholar]
  5. Comai, S., Bertazzo, A., Bailoni, L., Zancato, M., Costa, C. V., & Allegri, G. (2007). The content of proteic and nonproteic (free and protein-bound) tryptophan in quinoa and cereal flours. Food Chemistry, 100(4), 1350-1355. [Google Scholar]
  6. Geren, H., & Güre, E. (2017). A Preliminary Study on the Effect of Different N and P Levels on the Grain Yield and Other Yield Components of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 54(1), 1-8. [Google Scholar]
  7. Geren, H., Kavut, Y. T., Topçu, G. D., Ekren, S., & İştipliler, D. (2014). Effects of Different Sowing Dates on the Grain Yield and Some Yield Components of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Grown Under Mediterranean Climatic Conditions. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 51(3), 297-305. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gómez-Pando, L. R., Alvarez-Castro, R., & Eguiluz-de la Barra, A. (2010). Effect of salt stress on Peruvian germplasm of Chenopodium quinoa Willd.: A promising crop. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 196, 391-396. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard. Earthscan Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacobsen, S. E. (2003). The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Reviews International, 19, 167-177. [Google Scholar]
  11.  Jacobsen, S. E., Jørgensen, I., & Stølen, O. (1994). Cultivation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) under temperate climatic conditions in Denmark. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 122(1), 47-52. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jacobsen, S.-E., Jørgensen, I., & Stølen, O. (1994). Cultivation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) under temperate climatic conditions in Denmark. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 122, 47-52. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jensen, C. R., Jacobsen, S. E., Andersen, M. N., Núñez, N. S., Andersen, D., Rasmussen, L., & Mogensen, V. O. (2000). Leaf gas exchange and water relation characteristics of field quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) during soil drying. European Journal of Agronomy, 13, 11-25. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kakabouki, I., Bilalis, D., Karkanis, A., Zervas, G., Tsiplakou, E., & Hela, D. (2014). Effects of fertilization and tillage system on growth and crude protein content of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An alternative forage crop. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 26(1), 18-24. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kır, A. E., & Temel, S. (2017). Determination of Seed Yield and Some Agronomical Characteristics of Different Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Genotypes under Irrigated Conditions. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 7(1), 353-361. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lavini, A., Pulvento, C., d'Andria, R., Riccardi, M., Choukr-Allah, R., Belhabib, O., ... & Jacobsen, S. E. (2014). Quinoa's potential in the Mediterranean region. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 200(5), 344-360. [Google Scholar]
  17. Martínez, E. A., Veas, E., Jorquera, C., San Martín, R., & Jara, P. (2009). Re-introduction of quinoa into arid Chile: Cultivation of two lowland races under extremely low irrigation. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195(1), 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  18. Muratoglu, A., & Avanoz, Z. (2021). Spatial analysis of blue and green water footprints of agricultural crop patterns: Turkey. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management, 174(6), 291-308. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pulvento, C., Riccardi, M., Lavini, A., D’andria, R., Iafelice, G., & Marconi, E. (2010). Field trial. [Google Scholar]
  20. Samutoğlu, N., Baştuğ, R., Karaca, C., & Büyüktaş, D. (2021). The effects of different levels of irrigation practices on quinoa I: Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 34(1), 63-69. [Google Scholar]
  21. Schooten, H. V., & Pinxterhuis, J. B. (2003). Quinoa as an alternative forage crop in organic dairy farming. [Google Scholar]
  22. Temel, İ., & Keskin, B. (2019). The Effects of Different Row Spacing And Intra-Row Spacing On Hay Yield and Some Yield Components of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 9(1), 522-532. [Google Scholar]
  23. Turan, E. S. (2017). An evaluation of Turkey’s water footprint. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi, 74(EK-1), 55-62. [Google Scholar]
  24. WWF. (2014). Turkey's Water Footprint Report: Relationship between Water, Production and International Trade. Access address: http://d2hawiim0tjbd8.cloudfront.net/downloads/su_ayak_izi_raporweb.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yazar, A., & Kaya, Ç. İ. (2014). A new crop for salt-affected and dry agricultural areas of Turkey: Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(Özel Sayı-2), 1440-1446. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yerli, C., Şahin, Ü., Kızıloğlu, F. M., Tüfenkçi, Ş., & Örs, S. (2019). Water Footprint of Silage Corn, Potato, Sugar Beet and Alfalfa in Van Province. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29(2), 195-203. [Google Scholar]