Grouping Some Paddy Cultivars in Terms of Zinc Nutrition Capabilities and Identification of the Best Zinc Nutrition Traits of These Cultivars

Ahmet Korkmaz & Güney Akınoğlu

doi:https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2021.339.7

Original article | Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2021, Vol. 5(1) 91-102

Grouping Some Paddy Cultivars in Terms of Zinc Nutrition Capabilities and Identification of the Best Zinc Nutrition Traits of These Cultivars

Ahmet Korkmaz & Güney Akınoğlu

pp. 91 - 102 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2021.339.7

Published online: March 31, 2021 | Number of Views: 116 | Number of Download: 574

Download PDF

Abstract

The present study was conducted to group some paddy cultivars in terms of their zinc nutritional capabilities and to identify the best zinc nutrition traits of these cultivars. Present experiments were conducted with 5 different paddy cultivars (Oryza sativa L. cv Biga İncisi, Osmancık 97, Hamzadere, Ronaldo, Edirne). In the experiment, a complete nutrient solution containing 0 and 2.0 µM Zn in the form of zinc sulphate heptahydrate was applied to lime-free (0 % CaCO3) and lime-added (4 % CaCO3) quartz sand media. Experiments were conducted in 5×2×2 factorial design with 3 replications. At the end of the experiments, zinc nutrition traits of paddy cultivars were determined. Both in lime-free and lime-added sand media, Biga İncisi paddy cultivar was identified as tolerant to zinc deficiency. Ronaldo paddy cultivar was identified as the most sensitive cultivar to zinc deficiency. It was observed that in terms of investigated 15 zinc nutrition traits, 5 different paddy cultivars grown under zinc deficiency (Zn0) conditions were gathered under 2 main groups. Biga İncisi and Edirne cultivars constituted the first group; Osmancık-97 and Hamzadere cultivars constituted the second group. On the other hand, Ronaldo cultivar was found to be closer to the second group including Osmancık-97 and Hamzadere cultivars. The closest paddy cultivars grown under zinc deficiency conditions in terms of investigated traits were identified as Biga İncisi and Edirne cultivars; on the other hand, the furthest cultivars were identified as Biga İncisi and Osmancık-97 cultivars. For Osmancık-97 and Biga İncisi paddy cultivars, SPAD readings in lime-added sand media were identified as the best zinc nutrition traits. For Edirne cultivar, zinc ratio transported to shoot and shoot relative dry matter content in lime-added media were identified as the best zinc nutrition traits. For Hamzadere cultivar, relative chlorophyll content in lime-free media was identified as the best zinc nutrition.

Keywords: Paddy cultivar, Zinc nutrition, Sensitive cultivar, Resistant cultivar

How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Korkmaz, A. & Akinoglu, G. (2021). Grouping Some Paddy Cultivars in Terms of Zinc Nutrition Capabilities and Identification of the Best Zinc Nutrition Traits of These Cultivars . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 5(1), 91-102. doi: 10.29329/ijiaar.2021.339.7

Harvard
Korkmaz, A. and Akinoglu, G. (2021). Grouping Some Paddy Cultivars in Terms of Zinc Nutrition Capabilities and Identification of the Best Zinc Nutrition Traits of These Cultivars . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 5(1), pp. 91-102.

Chicago 16th edition
Korkmaz, Ahmet and Guney Akinoglu (2021). "Grouping Some Paddy Cultivars in Terms of Zinc Nutrition Capabilities and Identification of the Best Zinc Nutrition Traits of These Cultivars ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 5 (1):91-102. doi:10.29329/ijiaar.2021.339.7.

References

Alloway, B.J. (2004). Zinc in soils and crop nutrition. International Zinc Association, 130, Brussels. [Google Scholar]
Arnon, D. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Plant Physiol, 24, 1-12. [Google Scholar]
Bowen, J.E. (1986). Kinetics of zinc uptake by two rice cultivars. Plant and Soil, 94, 99-107. [Google Scholar]
Broadley, M., White, P., Hammond, J., Zelko, I. & Lux, A. (2007). Zinc in plants. New Phytologist, 173, 677-702. [Google Scholar]
Brohi, A.R., Aydeniz, A., Karaman, M.R. & Erşahin, S. (1994). Bitki Besleme. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No:4, 105-106, Tokat. [Google Scholar]
Çakmak, I. (2000). Possible roles of zinc in protecting plant cells from damage by reactive oxygen species. New Phytologist, 146, 185-205. [Google Scholar]
Clemens, S. (2006). Evolution and function of phytochelatin synthases. Journal of Plant Physiology, 163, 319-332. [Google Scholar]
Gao, X., Zou, C. & Van der Zee, S. (2005). Tolerance to zinc deficiency in rice correlates with zinc uptake and translocation. Plant and Soil, 278(1), 253-261. [Google Scholar]
Humaria, T., Samreen, M., Javid, M., Amin, H.U., Shah, S., Ullah, S. & Alam, S. (2015). Effect of Zinc on Physico-chemical Parameters of Hydroponically grown Rice Varieties. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research, 4(3), 395-403. [Google Scholar]
IRRI. (2002). Standard evaluation system for rice (SES). International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, the Philippines. [Google Scholar]
Jakobson, B.S., Fong, F. & Eath, R.L. (1975). Carbonic anhydrase of spinach. Studies on its location, inhibition and physiological function. Plant Physiology, 55, 468-474. [Google Scholar]
Kacar, B. & İnal, A. (2008). Bitki Analizleri. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, Türkiye. [Google Scholar]
Marschner, H. (1995). Function of mineral nutrients: Micronutrients, Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 313-324, Academic Press, London, [Google Scholar]
Oserkowsky, J. (1933). Quantitative relation between chlorophyll land iron in green and chlorotic pear leaves. Plant Physiology. 8, 449-468. [Google Scholar]
Phuke, R.M., Anuradha, K., Radhika, K., Jabeen, F., Anuradha, G., Ramesh, T., Hariprasanna K, Mehtre S.P., Shivaji, Desphpande S.P., Anil G., Das, R.R., Rathore, A., Hash, T., Reddy, B.V.S., Kumar, A.A. (2017). Genetic variability, genotype×environment interaction, correlation, and GGE biplot analysis for grain iron and zinc concentration and other agronomic traits in RIL population of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 712. [Google Scholar]
Ponnamperuma, F.N. (1972). The chemistry of submerged soils. Advances in Agronomy, 24, 29-96. [Google Scholar]
Price, H.A. (1962). RNA-synthesis zinc deficiency and the kinetics of growth. Plant Physiology, 37. XXI. [Google Scholar]
Witham, F.H., Blaydes, D.F. & Devlin, R.M. (1971). Experiments in plant physiology. Van Nostrend Reinhold Company, New York, USA. [Google Scholar]
Yoshida, S. & Tanaka, A. (1969). Zinc deficiency of the rice plant in calcareous soils. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 15, 75-80. [Google Scholar]
Yoshida, S., Ahn, J.S. & Forno, D.A. (1973). Occurence, diagnosis, and correction of zinc deficiency of lowland rice. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 19(2), 83-93. [Google Scholar]
Zhang, X., Zhang, F. & Mao, D. (1998). Effect of Fe plaque outside roots on nutrient uptake by rice (Oryza sativa L.): zinc uptake. Plant and Soil, 202, 33-39. [Google Scholar]

Volume 5 Issue 1

March 2021

All Articles