International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research
Abbreviation: IJIAAR | ISSN (Online): 2602-4772 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiaar

Original article | International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2020, Vol. 4(4) 461-472

Evaluation of the Yield and Quality Properties of Some Potato Varieties and Candidate Genotypes in Yenisehir-Bursa Ecological Conditions

Nursel Çöl Keskin, Rahim Ada & Rifat Kepildek

pp. 461 - 472   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2020.320.8

Published online: December 25, 2020  |   Number of Views: 6  |  Number of Download: 38


Abstract

The experiment was implemented to evaluate the yield and quality properties of potato varieties and candidate

genotypes were examined in 2019 growing seansons under Yenisehir- Bursa conditions. The experimental design was a “Randomized Complete Block Design” with three replications. Eight potato candidate genotypes (“EA10”, “GAF4”, “MK-2”, “AH-11”, AFK-3”, “AA12”, “HA5”, “LOH3Y”) which were developed by Associate Proffessor Rahim Ada and four potato varieties (Marabel, Florice, Melody, Lady Olympia) were used as plant material in this experiment. The plant height (cm), number of stem per plant, number of tuber per plant, total tuber yield (t ha-1), dry matter content (%), yield of chips (%), yield of french-fries (%) were examined. According to results of this experiment, significant differences were found in all properties among the potato varieties and candidate genotypes statistically. The plant height changed between 48.3-107.3 cm, number of stem per plant was 4.6-10.0, number of tuber per hill was 4.3-16.6, total tuber yield per hectare was 8.9-52.1 t. In addition, dry matter content changed between 16.7- 25.0 %, yield of chips was 36.1-60.3 %, yield of french-fries was 55.0-70.8 %. The highest total tuber yield was obtained from Florice variety (52.1 t ha-1) and “GAF4” potato candidate genotype (49.6 t ha-1) and the lowest total tuber yield was obtained from “AFK-3” potato candidate genotype (8.9 t ha-1, respectively). The experiment results indicated that “GAF4” potato candidate genotype was found promising.

Keywords: Potato breeding, adaptation, yield, quality.


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Keskin, N.C., Ada, R. & Kepildek, R. (2020). Evaluation of the Yield and Quality Properties of Some Potato Varieties and Candidate Genotypes in Yenisehir-Bursa Ecological Conditions . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 4(4), 461-472. doi: 10.29329/ijiaar.2020.320.8

Harvard
Keskin, N., Ada, R. and Kepildek, R. (2020). Evaluation of the Yield and Quality Properties of Some Potato Varieties and Candidate Genotypes in Yenisehir-Bursa Ecological Conditions . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 4(4), pp. 461-472.

Chicago 16th edition
Keskin, Nursel Col, Rahim Ada and Rifat Kepildek (2020). "Evaluation of the Yield and Quality Properties of Some Potato Varieties and Candidate Genotypes in Yenisehir-Bursa Ecological Conditions ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 4 (4):461-472. doi:10.29329/ijiaar.2020.320.8.

References
  1. Arslan, B. and Kevseroglu, K. (1991). Bitki sıklığının bazı patates (Solanum tuberosum l.) çeşitlerinin verimi ve önemli özellerine etkileri üzerinde bir araştirma. Yüzüncü yıl üniversitesi tarım bilimleri dergisi, 1(3), 89-111. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anonymous, (2020a). FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 01.08.2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anonymous, (2020b). TÜİK. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/Start.do Accessed 01.08.2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Anonymous, (2020c). Self Nutrition Data. http://www.nutritiondata.com/facts/vegetables-and-vegetableproducts/2770/ 2. Accessed 05 August 2020. [Google Scholar]
  5. Anonymous, (2020d). Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/ Accessed 01.08.2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. Anonymous,(2020e). Farmer. https://burea-uinsurance.com/en/description-of-the-potato-variety-melody/. Accessed 05 August 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. Anonymous,(2020f). Buy seed potaotes by the Garrigues Freres company. http://www.buy-seed-potatoes.com/portfolio/florice-seed-potatoes-florice/. Accessed 05 August 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Anonymous, (2020g). Buy seed potaotes by the Garrigues Freres company http://www.buy-seed-potatoes.com/portfolio/marabel/. Accessed 05 August 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. Anonymous,(2020h). The European Cultivated Potato Database https://www.europotato.org/varieties/view/Lady%20Olympia. Accessed 05 August 2020. [Google Scholar]
  10. Arioglu, H., Bakal, H., Onat, B., Gulluoglu, L. and Caliskan, M. E. (2018). The determination of tuber yield and some agronomic characteristics of potato breeding lines and varieties grown in winter season in Çukurova Region. , ISAS 2018-Winter, Samsun, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  11. Caliskan, M.E. (1997). Turfanda Patates Yetistiriciliginde Tohumluk Yumru Iriligi, Yumru Kesimi ve Dikim Sikliginin Bitki Gelisimi, Verim ve Ürünün Ekonomik Degeri Üzerine Etkileri. Çukurova Üni. Fen Bilimleri Ens. Tarla Bitkileri Anabilim Dali, Doktora Tezi, Adana, 167 s. [Google Scholar]
  12. Caliskan, M. E. (2001). Farklı olgunlaşma grubuna giren bazi patates çesitlerinin Hatay ekolojik kosullarindaki verim ve kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. MKU Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1-2), 39-50. [Google Scholar]
  13. Caliskan, S. and Caliskan, M. E. (2010). Effects of different organic production systems on growth and yield of potato. Proceedings of the Potato AgroPhysiology 2010, 20-24 September 2010, Nevsehir, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  14. Caliskan, M. E., Onaran, H., Arıoglu, H. (2010). Overview of the Turkish potato sector: challenges, achievements and expectations. Potato Research, 53(4), 255-266. [Google Scholar]
  15. Caliskan, M. E., Karaat, E. F. ve Celen, H. (2011). Türkiye ve bazı ülkelerin tohumluk patates üretim ve sertifikasyon sistemlerinin karşilaştirilmasi.Türkiye IV. Tohumculuk Kongresi.  [Google Scholar]
  16. Caliskan, M. E., 2018, Dünyada ve Türkiye'de Patatesin Önemi ve Üretimi, In: Patates Tarımı, Eds: Matbaası, H., İzmir: Tarım Gündem Dergisi, p. 16-25. [Google Scholar]
  17. Günel, E., Caliskan, M., KuSman, N., TuGrul, K., Yilmaz, A., Agirnasligil, T. ve Onaran, H., 2010, Nişasta ve şeker bitkileri üretimi, Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği VII. Teknik Kongresi, 11-15. [Google Scholar]
  18. Harris, P. M. (Ed.). (2012). The potato crop: the scientific basis for improvement. Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar]
  19. İlisulu, K. (1986). Nişasta, Şeker Bitkileri ve Islahı. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, 960. [Google Scholar]
  20. İncekara, F. (1973). Endüstri bitkileri ve ıslahı; Cilt 3 nişasta şeker bitkiler ve ıslahı (2. baskı) Ege Üni. Zir. Fak. Yay, (101). [Google Scholar]
  21. Karadogan, T. and Gunel, E. (1992). Bazi patates çeşitlerinin erzurum ekolojik koşullarina adaptasyonu ile verim ve verim unsurlari üzerine bir araştırma. Atatürk üniversitesi ziraat fakültesi dergisi, 23(1). [Google Scholar]
  22. Karadogan, T. (1994). Bazı patates çeşitlerinin cips ve parmak (kizarmiş) patates kalitesi üzerinde bir araştirma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1). [Google Scholar]
  23. Kita, A. (2002). The influence of potato chemical composition on crisp texture. Food chemistry, 76(2), 173-179. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kolsarici, O. and Bayraktar, N. (1987). Yağ Bitkileri Uygulama Kılavuzu. Ankara Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, (1017). [Google Scholar]
  25. Luthra, S. K. (2001). Heritability, genetic advance and character association in potato. J. Indian Potato Assoc, 28(1), 1-3. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ogurlu, E. (2019). Topraktan ve Yapraktan Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Patates Bitkisinin (Solanum Tuberosum L.) Verim ve Bazı Özelliklerine Etkisi.  Atatürk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü). [Google Scholar]
  27. Pringle, B., Pringle, R., Bishop, C., & Clayton, R. (2009). Potatoes postharvest. CABI. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sleper, D. A. and Poehlman, J. M. (2006). Breeding field crops (No. Ed. 5). Blackwell publishing. [Google Scholar]
  29. Singh, S. V., Pandey, S. K., Kumar, D., Patel, N. H., Khurana, P., & Paul, S. M. (2003). Performance of potato varieties/hybrids for French fries in north Gujarat. J. Indian Potato Assoc, 30, 15-16. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sanli, A. and Karadogan, T. (2012). Isparta Ekolojik Koşullarında Farklı Olgunlaşma Grubuna Giren Bazı Patates (Solanum tuberosum L.) Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Journal of Natural & Applied Sciences, 16(1). [Google Scholar]
  31. Tarakci, S. (2014).  Depolama sürelerinin bazı patates (Solanum tuberosum l.) çeşitlerinin kalite ve fizyolojik özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek lisans tezi , Tarla bitkileri anabilim dalı  [Google Scholar]
  32. Tekalign, T. and Hammes, P.S. (2005). Growth and Productivity of Potato as İnfluenced By Cutivar and Reproductive Growth: II. Growth Analysis, Tuber Yield and Quality. Scientia Horticulturae, 5, 29-44. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yildirim, M.B., C.F. Caliskan, Ö. Caylak, N. Budak, H. Unubol. (1997). Patateste Multivariate Iliskiler. Türkiye II. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 22-25 Eylül, Samsun, s.306-309. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yilmaz, G. ve Tugay, M., 1999, Patateste çeşit x çevre etkileşimleri. II. Çevresel faktörler yönünden irdeleme, Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23, 107-118. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wibowo, C., Wijaya, K., Sumartono, G. H., & Pawelzik, E. (2014). Effect of potassium level on quality traits of Indonesian potato tubers. Asia Pacific Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, Food and Energy, 2(1), 11-16. [Google Scholar]