International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research
Abbreviation: IJIAAR | ISSN (Online): 2602-4772 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiaar

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2020, Vol. 4(2) 156-165

Evaluation of Winter Vetch Varieties by Quality Indicators

Viliana Vasileva, Valentin Kosev & Yalçın Kaya

pp. 156 - 165   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2020.254.1

Published online: June 29, 2020  |   Number of Views: 117  |  Number of Download: 664


Abstract

Biochemical assessment of the aboveground biomass of 8 winter vetch (Vicia villosa) varieties was performed in two stages of plant development - beginning of flowering and technical maturity of seeds. Field trial was carried out in the Institute of Forage Crops, Pleven, Bulgaria (2014-2016). The variability in crude protein (CP) content (5.55 - 6.12%), calcium (8.17 - 9.87) and phosphorus (5.34 - 6.74%) in both phenological stages was weak. The variation of crude fiber (CF) content (6.02 - 11.08%) and crude ash (CA) (7.42 - 10.88%) was found stronger. At the beginning of flowering with a higher crude protein content Asko 1 (21.78%) and BGE001076 (21.53%), phosphorus content BGE001076 (0.48%), BGE004222 and BGE000643 (0.47%) were distinguished. In the technical maturity stage with a high crude protein content BGE004222 (20.51%) and BGE001847 (20.07%) are characterized and with phosphorus BGE004222 (0.38%). Positive statistically significant relationship was found between the grain yield and crude protein content (r = 0.58).

 

Keywords: Vetch, Aboveground mass, Biochemical assessment.


How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Vasileva, V., Kosev, V. & Kaya, Y. (2020). Evaluation of Winter Vetch Varieties by Quality Indicators . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 4(2), 156-165. doi: 10.29329/ijiaar.2020.254.1

Harvard
Vasileva, V., Kosev, V. and Kaya, Y. (2020). Evaluation of Winter Vetch Varieties by Quality Indicators . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 4(2), pp. 156-165.

Chicago 16th edition
Vasileva, Viliana, Valentin Kosev and Yalcin Kaya (2020). "Evaluation of Winter Vetch Varieties by Quality Indicators ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 4 (2):156-165. doi:10.29329/ijiaar.2020.254.1.

References
  1. Aleksieva, A., T. Bozhanska and Y. Naydenova (2016). Biochemical evaluation of breed lines of common vetch (Vicia sativa L. ssp.sativa) and opportunities to use them as green forage. J. Mount. Agric. Balk., 19 (3),  99-113. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alemu, B., S. Melaku and N. K. Prasad (2007). Effects of varying seed proportions and harvesting stages on biological compatibility and forage yield of oats (Avena sativa L.) and vetch (Vicia villosa R.) mixtures. Livest. Res. Rural Develop., 19 (1),  1-9. [Google Scholar]
  3. AOAC (1990). Offical methods of analysis. Association of the official analytical chemists. (15th edition) Arlington, USA. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aquilar-Lopez, E. Y., J. L. Boroques, I. A. Dominquez, A. Morales-Osorio and M. De Guadalupe Gutierrez-Martinez (2013). Forage yield, Chemical composition and In-vitro Gas Production of Triticale (xTriticose Wittmack) and Barley (Hordeum vulgare) associated with Common vetch (Vicia sativa) Preserved as Hay or Silage: 227-238. [Google Scholar]
  5. Barbashov, M. V. (2012). Evaluation of the initial material of common beans (Phasеolus vulgaris L) for the creation of highly effective plant-microbial systems. The dissertation author's abstract on competition of a scientific degree of the candidate of agricultural sciences. The Eagle.  [Google Scholar]
  6. Chekalin, N. M. (2003). Genetic bases of selection of leguminous crops for resistance to pathogens. Poltava: Intergraph, p.186 [Google Scholar]
  7. Desalegnр, K. and W. Hassen (2015). Evaluation of Biomass Yield and Nutritional [Google Scholar]
  8. Value of Different Species of Vetch (Vicia). Acad. J. Nutr., 4 (3), 99-105. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dimova, D. and E. Marinkov (1999). Experimental work and biometrics. HAI-Plovdiv 263 (in Bulgarian). [Google Scholar]
  10. Goncharova, A. V., P. L. Goncharov, E. E. Andrusovich, T. V. Ryttel (2013). Integrated research in the selection of fodder crops. Genfond and plant breeding, 1, 118-124 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ilieva, A. and  G. Naidenova (2016). Phenotypic evaluation of variability in quality traits of Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica ssp. pannonica Crantz) accessions. Rastenievadni nauki (Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science), 53 (4), 63-67. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kadermas, I. G. (2014). Formation of photosynthetic and symbiotic apparatuses of plants and their contribution to the increase in the productivity of pea sowing agrocenoses (Pisum sativum L.). PhD thesis, Omsk, 147 p. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kebede, G., G. Assefa, A. Mengistu and H. Mohammed (2013). Evaluation of vetch species and their accessions for agronomic performance and nutritive value in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Agric. Sci., 24, 99-121. [Google Scholar]
  14. Naidenova, G., A. Ilieva and A. Aleksieva (2012). Investigation of winter vetch accessions as initial material for breeding in grass-feed direction. J. Mount. Agric. Balk., 15 (6), 1388-1404. [Google Scholar]
  15. Nakova, R. and S. Christova (2012). Contemporary investigations on competitive relations between maize (Zea mays L.) and weeds. Rastenievadni nauki (Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science), 59 (4), 73-77.  [Google Scholar]
  16. Popovic, V., M. Tatić, V. Sikora, J. Ikanovic, G. Drazic, V. Djukic, B. Mihailovic, V. Filipovic, G. Dozet, L. Jovanovic and P. Stevanovic (2016). Variability of yield and chemical composition in soybean genotypes grown under different agroecological conditions of Serbia. Rom. Agric. Res., 33, 29-39.  [Google Scholar]
  17. Stoycheva,  I. (2015). Influence of grazing and preserved forage on milk production of sheep. PhD Thesis, Pleven, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  18. Stoycheva, I. and A. Kirilov (2019). Feeding female lambs with peas and soybeans as protein sources. Arch. Zootech., 21 (1), 57-63.  [Google Scholar]
  19. Vasileva, V. and E. Vasilev (2012). Study on Productivity of some Legume Crops in Pure Cultivation and Mixtures. Agric. Conspec. Sci., 77 (2), 91-94. [Google Scholar]
  20. Vasyakin, N. I. (2002). Leguminous crops in western Siberia. Omsk, 2002. 234 pp [Google Scholar]