International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research
Abbreviation: IJIAAR | ISSN (Online): 2602-4772 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiaar

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2020, Vol. 4(1) 10-20

Evaluation of Sweet Sorghum Biomass as an Alternative Livestock Feed

Celal Yücel

pp. 10 - 20   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2020.238.2

Published online: March 29, 2020  |   Number of Views: 209  |  Number of Download: 809

Download PDF

Abstract

In case of using sorghum biomass as a source of feed, quality attributes of different forms of the biomass should be known. This study was conducted to determine quality attributes of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor var. saccharatum (L.) Mohlenbr.) biomass in different forms. Six different sweet sorghum varieties (M81-E, Ramada, Roma, Topper 76, UNL Hybrid and No 91) were used in different forms. Quality attributes of sweet sorghum herbage before silage (SSH), whole plant silage (WPS) and sap-extracted bagasse silage (SES) were determined. Harvests were performed at milk-dough stage of the plants.While green herbage had greater crude protein ratios, whole plant silages had greater values for the other quality attributes. The sap-extracted bagasse silage had a mean RFV of over 111 indicating a high quality feed. As compared to other varieties, Topper 76 and Ramada varieties had greater values for quality attributes of sweet sorghums.

Keywords: Sweet Sorghum, Silage, Biomass, Quality, Feed

How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Yucel, C. (2020). Evaluation of Sweet Sorghum Biomass as an Alternative Livestock Feed . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 4(1), 10-20. doi: 10.29329/ijiaar.2020.238.2

Harvard
Yucel, C. (2020). Evaluation of Sweet Sorghum Biomass as an Alternative Livestock Feed . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 4(1), pp. 10-20.

Chicago 16th edition
Yucel, Celal (2020). "Evaluation of Sweet Sorghum Biomass as an Alternative Livestock Feed ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 4 (1):10-20. doi:10.29329/ijiaar.2020.238.2.
References
  1. Almodares, A,, M.R. Hadi and H. Ahmadpour (2008). Sorghum stem yield and soluble cabohdrates under phonological stages and salinity levels. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 7, 4051-4055.  [Google Scholar]
  2. Aman, P. (1993). Composition and structure of cell wall polysaccharides in forages. In: Jung HG, Buxton DR, Hatfield RD, Ralph J. (Eds.), Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 183-199. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anonoymous, (2018). SGS Agrifood Laboratories. Feed/Forages Calculations. http://www.agtest.com/articles/feed%20and%20forages%20calculations_new.pdf. AOAC, Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1990). Official method of analysis. 15th ed. Washington, DC. USA, 66-88. [Google Scholar]
  4. Avila, S.C., A.A. Martins, G. V. Kozloski, T. Orlandi, M. P. Mezzoma, C.M. Stefanello, F. Hentz, and P. Castagnıno (2013). Sunflower meal supplementation to wethers fed sorghum bagasse silage. Ciênc. Rural, 42 (7), 1245-1250. [Google Scholar]
  5. Beta, T., L.W. Rooney and R.D. Waniska (1995). Malting characteristics of sorghum cultivars. Cereal Chem., 72, 533-538. [Google Scholar]
  6. Blümmel, M., S.S. Rao, S. Palaniswami, L. Shahand B.V.S. Reddy (2009). Evaluation of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) used for bio-ethanol production in the context of optimizing whole plant utilization. Anim. Nutr. Feed Techn., 9, 1-10.  [Google Scholar]
  7. Cattani, M., N. Guzzo, R. Mantovaniand L. Bailoni (2017). Effects of total replacement of corn silage with sorghum silage on milk yield, composition, and quality. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechno., 8,15. DOI 10.1186/s40104-017-0146-8. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chakravarthi, M.K., Y.R. Reddy, K.S. Rao, A. Ravi, B. Punyakumari and B. Ekambaram (2017). A study on nutritive value and chemical composition of sorghum fodder. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Te., 6 (1), 104-9. [Google Scholar]
  9. Durul, G. (2016). Farklı biçim zamanlarının tatlı sorgum (sorghum bicolor (l.) moench var. saccharatum) ve fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris) silaj karışımlarında bazı kalite özelliklerine etkisi. Ege Üni. Fen Bil. Ens., Tarla Bitk.ABD, Y. Lisans Tezi), 72 s. [Google Scholar]
  10. FAO, Food and Agricultural Organization.  (1995). Sorghum and millet in human nutrition. FAO Food and Nutrition Series No. 27. ISBN 92-5-103381-1. Consulted on 10 September 2005 at: http://www.fao.org [Google Scholar]
  11. Gnansounou, E., A. Dauriat and C.E. Wyman (2005). Refining sweet sorghum to ethanol and sugar: economic trade-offs in the context of North China.  Bioresour Technol., 96, 985-1002. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gomes, S.O., J.B. Pitombeira, J.N.M. Neivaand M.J.D. Candidado (2006). Agronomic behavior and forage composition of sorghum cultivars in the State of Ceará. Rev. Ciênc. Agron., 37 (2), 221-2277.  [Google Scholar]
  13. Hatfield, R.D. (1993). Cell wall polysaccharide interactions and digestibility. In ‘Forage cell wall structure and digestibility’. (Eds HG Jung, DR Buxton, RD Hatfield, J Ralph) pp. 285–313. (ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Madison, WI). [Google Scholar]
  14. Jafarinia, M.,  A. Almodaresand M. Khorvash (2005). Using sweet sorghum bagasse in silo In: Proceeding of the 2nd Congress of Using Renewable Sources and Agric. Wastes (Eds. M Jafarinia, A Almodares & M Khorvash). Khorasgan Azade University, Isfahan, Iran. [Google Scholar]
  15. Junior, M.A.P.O., M. Retore, D.M. Manarelli, F.B. de Souza,  L.M. Ledesma and  A.C.A. Orrico (2015). Forage potential and silage quality of four varieties of saccharine sorghum. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras., 50 (12), 1201-1207.  [Google Scholar]
  16. Kaiser, A.G., J.W. Plitz, H.M. Burns and N.W.  Griffiths (2004). Successful Silage. Dairy Australia NSW Department of Primary Industries,  468p. [Google Scholar]
  17. Karadağ, Y. and M. Özkurt (2014). İkinci ürün olarak yetiştirilebilecek silajlık sorgum (Sorghum Bicolor (L). Moench) çeşitlerinde farklı sıra aralıklarının verim ve kalite üzerine etkisi. Gaziosmanpaşa Üni. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 31(1), 19-24. [Google Scholar]
  18. Karthikeyan, B. J.,  C. Babu and  J. J.  Amalraj (2017). Nutritive value and fodder potential of different sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) cultivars. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol.  App. Sci., 6(8), 898-911. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kumari, N. N., Y.R. Reddy, M.  Blümmel, D. Nagalakshmi and T. Monica (2013). Effect of feeding sweet sorghum bagasse silage with or without chopping on nutrient utilization in deccani sheep. Anim. Nutr. Feed Techn., 13, 243-249. [Google Scholar]
  20. Machado, L.C, W.M. Ferreira and C.  Scpinello (2012). Apparent digestibility of simplified and semi-simplified diets, with and without addition of enzymes, and nutritional value of fibrous sources for rabbits.  R. Bras. Zootec., 41, 1662-1670. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mahmood, A., H. Ullah, M. Ijaz, M.M. Javaid, A.N. Shahzad and B. Honermeier (2013a). Evaluation of sorghum hybrids for biomass and biogas production.  Aust. J. Crop Sci.,  7 (10), 1456-1462.  [Google Scholar]
  22. Mahmood, A., H. Ullah, A.N. Shahzad, H. Ali, S. Ahmad, M. Zia-Ul-haq, B. Honermeier and M. Hasanuzzaman (2013b). Dry Matter Yield and Chemical Composition of Sorghum Cultivars with Varying Planting Density and Sowing Date. Sains Malays., 42(10), 1529–1538. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mastrorilli, M., N. Katerjiand G. Ranai (1999). Productivity and water use efficiency of sweet sorghum as affected by soil water deficit occurring at different vegetative growth stages. Eur. J. Agron., 11, 207-215. [Google Scholar]
  24. Naeini, S. Z.,  M. Khorvash, E. Rowghani, A. Bayat and Z. Nikousefat  (2014). Effects of urea and molasses supplementation on chemical composition, protein fractionation and fermentation characteristics of sweet sorghum and bagasse silages as alternative silage crop compared with maize silage in the arid areas. Res. Opin. Anim. Vet. Sci., 4(6), 343-352.  [Google Scholar]
  25. Negro, M.J., M. L. Solano, P. Ciria and J. Carrasco (1999). Composting of sweet sorghum bagasse with other wastes. Bioresour Technol., 67, 89-92. [Google Scholar]
  26. Neto, A.B., R. H. Pereira dos Reis, S. Cabral L. da, J. G. Abreu, D.P. Sousa  and F.G. Sousa (2017). Nutritional value of sorghum silage of different purposes. Ciênc. Agrotec., 41(3), 288-299.  [Google Scholar]
  27. Poehlman, J. M (1994). Breeding sorghum and millet. In Breeding field crops, 3rd ed, ed. J.M. Poehlman, 508-541. Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State University Press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Reisi, F. and A. Almodares  (2008). The effect of planting date on amylose content in sorghum and corn. In: Proceeding of the 3rd Int. Biol. conference (Eds. F Reisi & A Almodares). Tehran, Iran. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rocha, G.,  F. Mara and E.A. Ricardo et al. (2018). Fermentation characteristics and bromatological composition of sweet sorghum bagasse silages. Rev. Bras. de Saude e Prod. Anim., 19 (2), 157-165. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rodrigues, F.O., A. F. de S. França R. de P. Oliveira, E.R. de Oliveria,  B. Rosa, T. V. Soares and S. Q.S Mello (2006). Produção e composição bromatológica de quatro híbridos de sorgo forrageiro (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) submetidos atrês doses de nitrogênio. Ciênc. Anim. Bras., 7, 37-48. [Google Scholar]
  31. Schroeder, J. W. (1994). Interpreting forage Analysis. Extention Dairy specialist (NDSU). AS-1080, North Dakota State University. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tesso, T. T., L. E. Claflin and M.R. Tuinstra (2005). Analysis of stalk rot resistance and genetic diversity among drought tolerant sorghum genotypes. Crop Sci., 45, 645-652. [Google Scholar]
  33. Trulea, A., T. Vintila, G. Pop, R. Sumalan and S. Gaspar  (2013). Ensiling sweet sorghum and maize stalks as feedstock for renewable energy production. Res. J. Agric. Sci., 45, 193-199. [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Soest, P.J., J. D. Robertson and B. A. Lewis (1991). Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74, 3583-3597.  [Google Scholar]
  35. Vidya B, Reddy Y R, Rao D S, Reddy V R, Kumari N N & Blummel M (2016). Effect of supplementation of concentrate to sweet sorghum bagasse with leaf residue silage on nutrient utilization and nitrogen balance in native sheep. Indian J. Anim. Res., 50 (3), 387-391. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yücel, C., İ. İnal, F. Gündel, D. Yücel, A. Aktaş, H.A. Karaağaç, R. Hatipoğlu. and I. Dweikat (2017). Biyoetanol Üretiminde Kullanılmış Tatlı Sorgum Saplarının Silaj Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. KSÜ Doğa Bil. Derg., 20 (Özel Sayı), 144-148. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yücel, C., R. Hatipoğlu, I. Dweikat, I. İnal, F. Gündel and H. Yucel (2018). A Research on Determination of Biyo- etanol Production Potential of Different Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor var. saccharatum (L.) Mohlenbr.) Genotypes in Çukurova and GAP Regions. TUBITAK 1003 Project Final Report. [Google Scholar]
Meta
Vol. 4 (1)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 4 Issue 1

March 2020

All Articles
Copyright © 2012 - 2024 International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research.
Pen Academic Publishing is a trademark of THDSoft.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY-NC-ND
Electronic Journal Management System. This software was developed in Türkiye. ejournal.gen.tr
Pen Academic Publishing General Publication Policy: