Pen Academic Publishing   |  e-ISSN: 2602-4772

Original article | International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2019, Vol. 3(1) 96-111

Assessment of Initial Material of Vetches in Productive and Adaptive Ability

Valentin Kosev, Viliana Vasileva & Yalçın Kaya

pp. 96 - 111   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2019.188.10   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1808-13-0003

Published online: March 29, 2019  |   Number of Views: 13  |  Number of Download: 78


Abstract

Eight winter vetch varieties (BGE004222, BGE001847, BGE000637, BGE001076, BGE000639, BGE000643, BGE001383 and Asko 1) were assessed by plant height, fresh leaf weight, fresh stem weight and nodule number per plant in field trial in the Institute of Forage Crops, Pleven, Bulgaria. The varieties are characterised by low general adaptive ability and average specific adaptive ability on the investigated signs. With the highest general adaptive ability by fresh leaf weight is distinguished BGE000643, by number of nodules per plant BGE004222 and BGE001383, and by plant height - BGE001847 and BGE000637, respectively. By the complex indicator selection value of the genotype, taking into account the general adaptive ability and stability, the signs fresh leaf weight and fresh stem weight the best was found BGE001383 variety. According to the number of nodules per plant and the indicators of adaptability and stability, the interest represents the variety BGE004222. Based on the aggregate assessment of the varieties, which is based on the average height of the plant and the parameters of adaptability, the most valuable were the varieties BGE001847 and BGE001076. A positive correlation was established between fresh leaf weight and: the specific adaptive ability (r = 0.568), the general adaptive ability (r = 0.099) and the indicator of the stability level of the variety (r = 0.544); and between the number of nodules with the coefficient of linear regression (r = 0.115) and with homeostaticity (r = 0.116).

Keywords: Genotype, Selection value, Stability, Vetch


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Kosev, V., Vasileva, V. & Kaya, Y. (2019). Assessment of Initial Material of Vetches in Productive and Adaptive Ability . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 3(1), 96-111. doi: 10.29329/ijiaar.2019.188.10

Harvard
Kosev, V., Vasileva, V. and Kaya, Y. (2019). Assessment of Initial Material of Vetches in Productive and Adaptive Ability . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 3(1), pp. 96-111.

Chicago 16th edition
Kosev, Valentin, Viliana Vasileva and Yalcin Kaya (2019). "Assessment of Initial Material of Vetches in Productive and Adaptive Ability ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 3 (1):96-111. doi:10.29329/ijiaar.2019.188.10.

References
  1. Anokhina, V.S. and E. S. Mazuka (2006). Characteristic of intervarietal hybrids of vegetable bean in connection with adaptive potential of initial cultivars. Newspaper BSU, 2 (2), 48.  [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashiev, A. R. (2014). Initial material of peas (Pisum sativum L.) and its selective use in the conditions of the pre-rural steppe of the Republic of Bashkortostan. PhD thesis. Kazan, 184 p. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cruz, C. D. (2009). Programa Genes: Biometria. version 7.0. University of Federal Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil. [Google Scholar]
  4. Debelyi, G.A, A.G. Goncharov and Mednov A. V. (2011). Estimation of adaptability and stability in spring vetch genotypes on height of plants in monospecies and mixed sowing. Agric. Biol., 2, 90-92. [Google Scholar]
  5. Debelyj, G.A., L.V. Kalinina, A. V. Mednov and A. V. Goncharov (2015). New generation of varieties of leguminous crops released by the Moscow Research Institute of Agriculture. Leguminous and cereal crops, 1 (13),10-14. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dimova, D. and E. Marinkov (1999). Experimental work and biometrics. HAI-Plovdiv 263 (in Bulgarian). [Google Scholar]
  7. Finlay, K.W. and G. N. Wilkinson (1963). The analysis of adaptation in plant breeding programmе. Austral. J. Agric. Res. 14 (6), 742-754. [Google Scholar]
  8. Francis, T.R. and L. W. Kannenberg (1978). Yield stability studies in short-season maize: I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Can. J. Plant Sci., 58(4), 1029-1034.  [Google Scholar]
  9. Hangildin, V.V. (1984). The problem of gemostasis in genetic-selective studies / Hangildin V.V., Biryukov S.V. // Genetic-cytological aspects in selections of agricultural plants, 1, 67-76. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kilchevsky, A.V. and L. V. Khotyleva (1985a). Methods for assessing the adaptive ability and stability of genotypes, the differentiating ability of the environment. Communication 1. Justification of the method. Genetics, 21 (9), 1481-1490. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kilchevsky, A.V. and L. V. Khotyleva (1985b). Methods for assessing the adaptive ability and stability of genotypes, the differentiating ability of the environment. Communication 2. Numerical example and discussion. Genetics, 21 (9), 1491-1498. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kilchevsky, A.V. and L. V. Khotyleva (1989). Genotype and environment in plant breeding. MN: Science and Technology, p. 191.  [Google Scholar]
  13. Korzun, O.S. and A.S. Bruylo (2011). Adaptive features of selection and seed farming of agricultural plants, UO-GGAU, Grodno, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kurkova, I. V., A. S. Kuznetsova and M. V. Terekhin (2015). Parameters of environmental plasticity of cultivars and varieties of amur spring barley. Newspaper NGAU, 3 (36), 19-24.  [Google Scholar]
  15. Nascimento, M., C. D. Cruz, A. C. M. Campana, R. S. Tomaz, C. C. Salgado and R. Ferreira (2009). Change in centroid method for assessing genotypic adaptability. Agric. Res. Brazil, Brasilia, 44 (3), 263-269.  [Google Scholar]
  16. Nettevich, E. D., A. I. Morgunov and M. I. Maksimenko (1985). Increase of the efficiency of spring wheat selection on stability of yield and grain quality. Bull. Agric. Sci., 1, 66-74. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nikiforova, I.Yu. (2015). Evaluation of adaptive potential of samples of common millet from various groups of ripeness on the statistical parameters calculated by sign «productivity of grain». Leguminous and cereal crops, Leguminous and cereal crops, 1 (13), 79-83. [Google Scholar]
  18. Popovic, V., J. Miladinovic, M. Vidic, S. Vuckovic, G. Drazic, J. Ikanovic, V. Djekic and V. Filipovic (2015). Determining genetic potential and quality components of NS soybean cultivars under different agroecological conditions. Rom. Agric. Res., 32, 35-45. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rossielle, A. A. and J. Hamblin (1981). Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and no stress environment. Crop Sci., 21 (6),12-23.  [Google Scholar]
  20. Sapega, S.V. (2011). Productivity and adaptive ability of varieties of grain crops in the forest-steppe of northern Zaural. Abstract of thesis for the degree of candidate of agricultural sciences. Tyumen.  [Google Scholar]
  21. Sapega, V.A., G.Sh. Tursumbekova and S. V. Sapega (2012). Productivity and parameters of stability of grades of grain crops. Achievements of Science and Technology, (10), 22-26.  [Google Scholar]
  22. Sarviro, E. (2008). About correlation dependency of parameters of combinative ability of sorts on adaptive ability of F1 hybrids of tomato in fields and non-heated greenhouses. Agronomia, 2, 43-46.  [Google Scholar]
  23. Vasconcelos, E. S., M. S. Reis, C. D. Cruz, T. Sediyama and C. A. Scapim (2011). Integrated method for adaptability and phenotypic stability analysis. Acta Sci-Agron., 33(2), 251-257. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vasconcelos, E. S., W. Barioni Júnior, C. D. Cruz, R. P. Ferreira, J. B. Rassini and D. Vilela (2008). Seleção de genótipos de alfafa pela adaptabilidade e estabilidade da produção de matéria seca. Acta Sci.- Agron., 30(3), 339-343. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zharkova, S.V. (2009). Correlation analysis at signs of productivity of onions and its use in practical selection. Agronomy, 12 (62), 9-14.  [Google Scholar]