International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research
Abbreviation: IJIAAR | ISSN (Online): 2602-4772 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiaar

Research article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research Volume 10 (2026)

YABBY Transcription Factors in Chickpea: Evolutionary Footprints and Functional Clues under Drought Stress

Serdar Coşkun, E. Sümer Aras, İlker Büyük

pp. 1 - 17   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2026.1423.13

Publish Date: May 27, 2026  |   Single/Total View: 0/0   |   Single/Total Download: 0/0

PDF Download

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important plant species globally due to its economic value and nutritional content. The YABBY gene family plays a significant role in the growth and development of plants. A review of the literature reveals that there has been no prior study conducted on the YABBY gene family in chickpea. Based on this gap, the aim of this study is to perform a comprehensive analysis of the YABBY gene family in chickpea (C. arietinum L.) and to evaluate the transcript levels of these genes under drought stress. This study aims to uncover the potential roles of YABBY proteins in drought tolerance. YABBY proteins were identified and classified using chickpea genome data through bioinformatic approaches. Phylogenetic analysis, motif structure, chromosomal localization, and gene structure were examined. The expression levels of YABBY genes under drought stress were visualized in the form of a heat map using in silico techniques. As a result of the analyses, 8 CaYABBY family members were identified in the chickpea (C. arietinum L.) genome. These proteins range in length from 97 to 221 amino acids. The isoelectric points (pI) of YABBY proteins range from 5.15 to 9.58, covering both acidic and basic ranges, and their molecular weights vary between 10.90 and 24.62 kDa. CaYABBY gene family could be classified into the INO, YAB5, YAB2, CRC and FYAB3 subgroups. The genomic distribution of YABBY proteins in chickpea (C. arietinum L.) is irregular, although they share similar motif structures. According to our RNA-seq data, YABBY proteins may potentially play a role in the molecular adaptation processes of chickpea (C. arietinum L.) under drought stress. These results give a good starting point for more research on how chickpeas work and suggest possible ways to make them more resistant to drought by using breeding or genetic methods.

Keywords: Bioinformatics, Chickpea, Genome-wide analysis, YABBY genes

How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Coskun, S., Aras, E.S., & Buyuk, I. (2026). YABBY Transcription Factors in Chickpea: Evolutionary Footprints and Functional Clues under Drought Stress. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2026.1423.13

Harvard
Coskun, S., Aras, E. and Buyuk, I. (2026). YABBY Transcription Factors in Chickpea: Evolutionary Footprints and Functional Clues under Drought Stress. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 10(1), pp. 1-17.

Chicago 16th edition
Coskun, Serdar, E. Sumer Aras and Ilker Buyuk (2026). "YABBY Transcription Factors in Chickpea: Evolutionary Footprints and Functional Clues under Drought Stress". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 10 (1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2026.1423.13
References
  1. Alajaji, S. A., & El-Adawy, T. A. (2006). Nutritional composition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as affected by microwave cooking and other traditional cooking methods. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 19(8), 806–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2006.03.015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  2. Bailey, T. L., Johnson, J., Grant, C. E., & Noble, W. S. (2015). The MEME Suite. Nucleic acids research, 43(W1), W39–W49. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv416. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  3. Balasubramanian, S., & Schneitz, K. (2002). NOZZLE links proximal-distal and adaxial-abaxial pattern formation during ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development (Cambridge, England), 129(18), 4291–4300. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.129.18.4291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Bartels, D. and Sunkar, R. (2005). Drought and Salt Tolerance in Plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 24, 23-58.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07352680590910410. [Google Scholar]
  5. Buyuk, I, Ilhan E, Sener D, Ozsoy AT, Aras, S. (2019). Genome-wide identification of CAMTA gene family members in Phaseolus vulgaris L. and their expression profiling during salt stress. Mol Biol Rep 46, 2721–2732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-04716-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Buttar, Z. A., Yang, Y., Sharif, R., Nan Wu, S., Xie, Y., Wang, C. (2020). Genome Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Analysis of YABBY Gene Family in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Agronomy, 10(8),1189.https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  7. Bowman J. L. (2000). The YABBY gene family and abaxial cell fate. Current opinion in plant biology, 3(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-5266(99)00035-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  8. Candela, M., Astiasaran, I., & Bello, J. (1997). Cooking and Warm-Holding: Effect on General Composition and Amino Acids of Kidney Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum), and Lentils (Lens culinaris). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 45(12), 4763– 4767. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9702609. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  9. Chinnusamy, V., Schumaker, K., & Zhu, J. K. (2004). Molecular genetic perspectives on cross-talk and specificity in abiotic stress signalling in plants. Journal of experimental botany, 55(395), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  10. Chen, C., Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Thomas, H. R., Frank, M. H., He, Y., & Xia, R. (2020). TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Molecular plant, 13(8), 1194–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Dong, Q., Hu, B., & Zhang, C. (2022). microRNAs and Their Roles in Plant Development. Frontiers in plant science, 13, 824240. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.824240. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  12. Eshed, Y., Baum, S. F., & Bowman, J. L. (1999). Distinct mechanisms promote polarity establishment in carpels of Arabidopsis. Cell, 99(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81651-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  13. Goodstein, D. M., Shu, S., Howson, R., Neupane, R., Hayes, R. D., Fazo, J., Mitros, T., Dirks, W., Hellsten, U., Putnam, N., & Rokhsar, D. S. (2012). Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic acids research, 40 (Database issue), D1178–D1186. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr944. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Golz, J. F., Roccaro, M., Kuzoff, R., & Hudson, A. (2004). GRAMINIFOLIA promotes growth and polarity of Antirrhinum leaves. Development (Cambridge, England), 131(15), 3661–3670. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  15. Han, Y.; Cheng, H.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, D.; Wu, J.; Liu, L.; Yan, M.; Zhou, D. Identification and Characterization of the BnFAR1/FHY3 Gene Family and Expression Analysis under Shading and Low-Temperature Responses in Brassica napus L. Agronomy 2024, 14, 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. Hao, L., Zhang, J., Shi, S., Li, P., Li, D., Zhang, T., & Guo, H. (2022). Identification and expression profiles of the YABBY transcription factors in wheat. PeerJ, 10, e12855. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12855. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Hashmi, M. M., Kamran, Z., Manzoor, M., Shafiq, M., Qamar, M., Nisa, M. U., … Shahid, M. A. (2022). Genome-wide Identification and Characterization of Plant-specific Transcription Factor YABBY Gene Family in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and its Comparison with Arabidopsis to Reveal its Role in Abiotic Stress Responses. Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences, 3(02), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2022.3.2.40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  18. Huang, Z., Van Houten, J., Gonzalez, G., Xiao, H., & van der Knaap, E. (2013). Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expression analysis of SUN, OFP and YABBY gene family in tomato. Molecular genetics and genomics: MGG, 288(3-4), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-013-0733-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  19. Inal, B., Büyük, İ., İlhan, E., & Aras, S. (2017). Genome-wide analysis of Phaseolus vulgaris C2C2-YABBY transcription factors under salt stress conditions. 3 Biotech, 7(5), 302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0933-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  20. Jukanti, A. K., Gaur, P. M., Gowda, C. L. L., & Chibbar, R. N. (2012). Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): A review. British Journal of Nutrition, 108(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512000797. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  21. Knauer, S., Holt, A. L., Rubio-Somoza, I., Tucker, E. J., Hinze, A., Pisch, M., Javelle, M., Timmermans, M. C., Tucker, M. R., & Laux, T. (2013). A protodermal miR394 signal defines a region of stem cell competence in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Developmental cell, 24(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2012.12.009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  22. Kong, L., Sun, J., Jiang, Z., Ren, W., Wang, Z., Zhang, M., Liu, X., Wang, L., Ma, W., & Xu, J. (2023). Identification and expression analysis of YABBY family genes in Platycodon grandiflorus. Plant signaling & behavior, 18(1), 2163069. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2022.2163069. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  23. Li, Z., Li, G., Cai, M., Priyadarshani, S. V. G. N., Aslam, M., Zhou, Q., Huang, X., Wang, X., Liu, Y., & Qin, Y. (2019). Genome-Wide Analysis of the YABBY Transcription Factor Family in Pineapple and Functional Identification of AcYABBY4 Involvement in Salt Stress. International journal of molecular sciences, 20 (23), 5863. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235863. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. Liu, H. L., Xu, Y. Y., Xu, Z. H., & Chong, K. (2007). A rice YABBY gene, OsYABBY4, preferentially expresses in developing vascular tissue. Development genes and evolution, 217(9), 629–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-007-0173-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Lenka, S. & Kailash, B. (2019). Abiotic stress responsive cis-regulatory elements (CREs) in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and other plants. OSF, 98: 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/n98t5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  26. Letunic, I., Bork P .(2011). Interactive Tree Of Life v2: online annotation and display of phylogenetic trees made easy. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W475–W478. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Lescot, M., Déhais, P., Thijs, G., Marchal, K., Moreau, Y., Van de Peer, Y., et al. (2002). PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 325–327.doi: 10,1093/nar/30.1.325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Ma, R., Huang, B., Huang, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2021). Genome-wide identification and analysis of the YABBY gene family in Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis (Carrière) J. Houz). PeerJ, 9, e11780. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11780. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Mazhar, H. S., Shafiq, M., Ali, H., Ashfaq, M., Anwar, A., Tabassum, J., Ali, Q., Jilani, G., Awais, M., Sahu, R., & Javed, M. A. (2023). Genome-Wide Identification, and In-Silico Expression Analysis of YABBY Gene Family in Response to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Potato (Solanum tuberosum). Genes, 14(4), 824. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040824. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  30. Nehra, A., Kalwan, G., Taneja, D., Jangra, R., Joshi, K., Kumar, A., Jain, P. K., Nehra, K., Ansari, M. W., Singh, K., Tuteja, N., Gill, R., & Gill, S. S. (2025). Comprehensive structural, evolutionary and functional analysis of superoxide dismutase gene family revealed critical role in salinity and drought stress responses in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant physiology and biochemistry: PPB, 226, 110042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110042. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  31. Navarro, C., Efremova, N., Golz, J. F., Rubiera, R., Kuckenberg, M., Castillo, R., Tietz, O., Saedler, H., & Schwarz-Sommer, Z. (2004). Molecular and genetic interactions between Stylosa and Gramınıfolıa in the control of Antirrhinum vegetative and reproductive development. Development (Cambridge, England), 131(15), 3649–3659. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  32. Pei, H., Ma, N., Chen, J., Zheng, Y., Tian, J., Li, J., Zhang, S., Fei, Z., & Gao, J. (2013). Integrative analysis of miRNA and mRNA profiles in response to ethylene in rose petals during flower opening. PloS one, 8(5), e64290. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  33. Pegler, J.L., Grof, C.P.L., Eamens, A.L. (2019). The Plant microRNA Pathway: The Production and Action Stages. In: de Folter, S. (eds) Plant MicroRNAs. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1932. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9042-9_2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  34. Rajani, S., & Sundaresan, V. (2001). The Arabidopsis myc/bHLH gene ALCATRAZ enables cell separation in fruit dehiscence. Current biology: CB, 11(24), 1914–1922. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00593-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  35. Reinhart, B. J., Weinstein, E. G., Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, B., & Bartel, D. P. (2002). MicroRNAs in plants. Genes & development, 16(13), 1616–1626. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1004402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  36. Sarojam, R., Sappl, P. G., Goldshmidt, A., Efroni, I., Floyd, S. K., Eshed, Y., & Bowman, J. L. (2010). Differentiating Arabidopsis shoots from leaves by combined YABBY activities. The Plant cell, 22(7), 2113–2130. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.075853. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  37. Sawa, S., Watanabe, K., Goto, K., Liu, Y. G., Shibata, D., Kanaya, E., Morita, E. H., & Okada, K. (1999). FILAMENTOUS FLOWER, a meristem and organ identity gene of Arabidopsis, encodes a protein with a zinc finger and HMG-related domains. Genes & development, 13(9), 1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.9.1079. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  38. Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003). Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome research, 13(11), 2498–2504. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  39. Siegfried, K. R., Eshed, Y., Baum, S. F., Otsuga, D., Drews, G. N., & Bowman, J. L. (1999). Members of the YABBY gene family specify abaxial cell fate in Arabidopsis. Development (Cambridge, England), 126(18), 4117–4128. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.126.18.4117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  40. Sieber, P., Petrascheck, M., Barberis, A., & Schneitz, K. (2004). Organ polarity in Arabidopsis. NOZZLE physically interacts with members of the YABBY family. Plant physiology, 135(4), 2172–2185. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.040154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  41. Schluttenhofer, C., & Yuan, L. (2015). Regulation of specialized metabolism by WRKY transcription factors. Plant physiology, 167(2), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.251769. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  42. Sunkar, R., Chinnusamy, V., Zhu, J., & Zhu, J. K. (2007). Small RNAs as big players in plant abiotic stress responses and nutrient deprivation. Trends in plant science, 12(7), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.05.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  43. Toriba, T., Harada, K., Takamura, A., Nakamura, H., Ichikawa, H., Suzaki, T., & Hirano, H. Y. (2007). Molecular characterization the YABBY gene family in Oryza sativa and expression analysis of OsYABBY1. Molecular genetics and genomic: MGG, 277(5), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-006-0202-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  44. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2005). Organization of cis-acting regulatory elements in osmotic- and cold-stress-responsive promoters. Trends in plant science, 10(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.12.012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  45. Yamada, T., Ito, M., & Kato, M. (2003). Expression pattern of INNER NO OUTER homologue in Nymphaea (water lily family, Nymphaeaceae). Development genes and evolution, 213(10), 510–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-003-0350-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  46. Yamaguchi, T., Nagasawa, N., Kawasaki, S., Matsuoka, M., Nagato, Y., & Hirano, H. Y. (2004). The YABBY gene DROOPING LEAF regulates carpel specification and midrib development in Oryza sativa. The Plant cell, 16(2), 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.018044. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  47. Yang, C., Ma, Y., & Li, J. (2016). The rice YABBY4 gene regulates plant growth and development through modulating the gibberellin pathway. Journal of experimental botany, 67(18), 5545–5556. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw319. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  48. Yang, Z., Gong, Q., Wang, L., Jin, Y., Xi, J., Li, Z., Qin, W., Yang, Z., Lu, L., Chen, Q., & Li, F. (2018). Genome-Wide Study of YABBY Genes in Upland Cotton and Their Expression Patterns under Different Stresses. Frontiers in genetics, 9, 33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00033. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  49. Yılmaz, A. A., Coşkun, S., Aras, E. S., & Büyük, İ., (2025). Integrative multi-omics analysis of the FAR1 gene family in Phaseolus vulgaris. Communications Faculty of Science University of Ankara Series C Biology Geological Engineering and Geophysical Engineering, vol.34, no.2, 154-175.10.53447/communc.1657858. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang, S., Wang, L., Sun, X., Li, Y., Yao, J., van Nocker, S., & Wang, X. (2019). Genome-Wide Analysis of the YABBY Gene Family in Grapevine and Functional Characterization of VvYABBY4. Frontiers in plant science, 10, 1207. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01207. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  51. Zhao, S., Zhang, Y., Tan, M., Jiao, J., Zhang, C., Wu, P., Feng, K., & Li, L. (2023). Identification of YABBY Transcription Factors and Their Function in ABA and Salinity Response in Nelumbo nucifera. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 12(2), 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020380. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  52. Zhao, S. P., Lu, D., Yu, T. F., Ji, Y. J., Zheng, W. J., Zhang, S. X., Chai, S. C., Chen, Z. Y., & Cui, X. Y. (2017). Genome-wide analysis of the YABBY family in soybean and functional identification of GmYABBY10 involvement in high salt and drought stresses. Plant physiologyand biochemistry:PPB, 119,132–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.08.026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  53. Wang, Y., Tang, H., Debarry, J. D., Tan, X., Li, J., Wang, X., Lee, T. H., Jin, H., Marler, B., Guo, H., Kissinger, J. C., & Paterson, A. H. (2012). MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic acids research, 40(7), e49. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1293. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
Meta
Volume 10 (2026)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 10 Issue 1

January 2026

All Manuscript
Copyright © 2026 International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research.
Pen Academic Publishing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY
All elements of this website have been created using the BOQ™ - eJournal Management System.
Pen Academic Publishing General Publication Policy: