Pen Academic Publishing   |  e-ISSN: 2602-4772

Original article | International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2019, Vol. 3(1) 8-15

Cuttings Viability after Treatment of the Mother Vineyard with Herbicides

Neli Prodanova-Marinova

pp. 8 - 15   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2019.188.2   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1810-15-0002

Published online: March 29, 2019  |   Number of Views: 19  |  Number of Download: 81


Abstract

During the period 2014–2016 at the Institute of Viticulture and Enology a trial was carried out to study the impact of the herbicides Gardoprim plus Gold (312.5 g/l s-metolachlor + 187.5 g/l terbuthylazine), Lumax 538 SC (375 g/l s-metolachlor + 125 g/l terbuthylazine + 337.5 g/l mesotrione) and Wing P (pendimethalin 250 g/l + dimethenamid P 212.5 g/l) on the yield of high-quality cuttings for production of vine propagation material. The treatments in the mother vineyard of Cabernet Sauvignon variety (clone D-1) were performed in the spring before the buds germination. The obtained cuttings were grafted in 2015, 2016 and 2017 on Berlandieri X Riparia SO4 rootstock. After the stratification, the grafted cuttings were planted in the nursery and their vegetative manifestations were monitored.

The cuttings from the herbicide-treated variants showed viability similar to the control, and their buds germinated with the same intensity. The yield of rooted vines did not differ significantly from the cuttings grown without herbicides, as the highest rate of standard propagation material was obtained with Gardoprim plus Gold (55.45%). The vine biometric indicators exceeded those of the control variant. The application of the herbicides Gardoprim plus Gold, Lumax 538 SC and Wing P for keeping the soil surface free from weeds did not 

Keywords: vine, cuttings, grafting, mother vineyard, nursery, herbicides


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Prodanova-Marinova, N. (2019). Cuttings Viability after Treatment of the Mother Vineyard with Herbicides . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 3(1), 8-15. doi: 10.29329/ijiaar.2019.188.2

Harvard
Prodanova-Marinova, N. (2019). Cuttings Viability after Treatment of the Mother Vineyard with Herbicides . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 3(1), pp. 8-15.

Chicago 16th edition
Prodanova-Marinova, Neli (2019). "Cuttings Viability after Treatment of the Mother Vineyard with Herbicides ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 3 (1):8-15. doi:10.29329/ijiaar.2019.188.2.

References
  1. Adlerz, W. C. and D. L. Hopkins (1979). Natural infectivity of two sharpshooter vectors of Pierce’s disease of grape in Florida. J. Econ. Entomol., 72(6), 916-919. [Google Scholar]
  2. Agustí-Brisach, C., D. Gramaje, M. León, J. García-Jiménez and J. Armengol (2011). Evaluation of vineyard weeds as potentialhosts of black-foot and Petri disease pathogens. Plant Dis., 95, 803-810 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boychev, А. (1980). Studies on water and nutrition regimen of weeds in the vineyards. Gradinarska i Lozarska Nauka, 2, 98 – 103.  [Google Scholar]
  4. Dimitrova, V., V. Peykov, E. Tsvetanov, H. Encheva and M. Chelebiev (2007). Optimization of the technology for the production of grafted rooted vines. Proceed. of scientific conference with international participation “Sustainable development of viticulture and enology, knowledge-based", Pleven, 29-30 August 2007. pp. 99-106. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dimova, D. and E. Marinkov (1999). Experimental Works and Biometry. Academic publishing house of HAI, Plovdiv, 263.  [Google Scholar]
  6. Duffus, J. E. (1971). Role of weeds in the incidence of virus diseases. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 9(1), 319-340. [Google Scholar]
  7. Magrisso, Y., S. Yonev, T. Cholakov, M. Nikov, B. Danailov, E. Raykov, A. Georgiev, V. Dimchev and D. Babrikov D. (1979). Commercial technologies in viticulture. Sofia. Zemizdat. 322.  [Google Scholar]
  8. Мoulis, I. (1992). Etude de la concurrence herbe – vigne. Consequences écophysiologiques sur la vigne de l'enherbement de vignoble en region Mediterranéenne.  Comptes rendues du IV simposium international de physiologie de la vigne, 11 – 15 mai, Torino, 93 – 97 [Google Scholar]
  9. Muganu, M., M. Paolocci, D. Gnisci, F. E. Barnaba, A. Bellincontro, F. Mencarelli and I. Grosu (2013). Effect of Different Soil Management Practices on Grapevine Growth and on Berry Quality Assessed by NIR-AOTF Spectroscopy Acta Hortic., 978, 117 – 125. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nikov, М. (1972). Growth and fruit-bearing of vines with prolonged use of herbicides without tillage. Gradinarska i Lozarska Nauka, IX, 7, 137 – 146. [Google Scholar]
  11. Patil, D., G. Sulikeri and H. Patil (2008). Studies on the weed management practices in Thompson seedless grape vineyard. Acta Hortic., 785, 321 - 326. [Google Scholar]
  12. Prodanova – Marinova, N. (2016).  Effect of some herbicides on weeds and vines in mother plantation of Cabernet sauvignon. Agric. Sci. Technol., 8 (3), 227 – 231. [Google Scholar]
  13. Prodanova-Marinova, N. (2012). Study on the Efficiency and Selectivity of Soil Herbicides in Vine Nursery. Dissertation Thesis for PhD Degree, 161.  [Google Scholar]
  14. Smirnov, K., F. Kalmykov and G. Morozov (1987). Viticulture. Agropromizdat, 877.  [Google Scholar]
  15. Steenwerth, K., A. Orellana-Calderón, R. Hanifin, C. Storm and A. McElrone (2016). Effects of Various Vineyard Floor Management Techniques on Weed  Community Shifts and Grapevine Water Relations. American journal of enology and viticulture, 67, 2, 153 – 162. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wistrom, C. and A. H. Purcell (2005). The fate of Xylella fastidiosa in vineyard weeds and other alternate hosts in California. Plant Dis., 89(9), 994-999. [Google Scholar]