Pen Academic Publishing   |  e-ISSN: 2602-4772

Original article | International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2018, Vol. 2(4) 349-358

Evaluation of the Hygienic Quality of Raw Milk at Different Levels of the Dairy Chain

Soumeya Kaouche-Adjlane

pp. 349 - 358   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2018.174.8   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1808-24-0001

Published online: December 17, 2018  |   Number of Views: 30  |  Number of Download: 125


Abstract

Variations in the hygienic quality of raw milk collected at different levels of the dairy chain from the farm, tanks, at the end of collection and at delivery in the north-central region of Algeria were studied over a period of one year. The average loads of all the germs of contamination increased gradually (p<0.001). The average values of these respective evolutions of the farm, at the end of collection and delivery, expressed in Log10 cfu/ml of raw milk for total aerobic mesophilic flora (TAMF), total and faecal coliforms (TC), (FC) values are (5.11, 6.42 and 7.5), (3.1, 4.6 and 5.31), (1.61, 3.29 and 4.29). Yeasts and molds are present with high levels of contamination in the samples analyzed, the average per milliliter expressed in Log10 cfu at each collection site are respectively (2.84, 4.58 and 5.34), (1 24, 3.23 and 3.88). The pathogenic flora also has increasing presence rates at each level of the dairy chain. Milks from farms that were already contaminated with Clostridium, Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus (15.27, 1.39 and 4.86%), respectively, arrived at the different dairies with exponential mean presence (50; 28.33 and 56.66%). However, it should be noted that the danger is all the more important as the presence rate and the microbial load are higher in raw milks. The strong growth of the micro-organisms studied once again demonstrates the variability of practices from one sampling site to another. This is the result of poor hygienic conditions during milking, they also provide information on the degree of handling of milk, including the observed transvasions.

Keywords: Hygienic quality, Raw milk, Farm, Collection, Delivery


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Kaouche-Adjlane, S. (2018). Evaluation of the Hygienic Quality of Raw Milk at Different Levels of the Dairy Chain. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 2(4), 349-358. doi: 10.29329/ijiaar.2018.174.8

Harvard
Kaouche-Adjlane, S. (2018). Evaluation of the Hygienic Quality of Raw Milk at Different Levels of the Dairy Chain. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 2(4), pp. 349-358.

Chicago 16th edition
Kaouche-Adjlane, Soumeya (2018). "Evaluation of the Hygienic Quality of Raw Milk at Different Levels of the Dairy Chain". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2 (4):349-358. doi:10.29329/ijiaar.2018.174.8.

References
  1. Belli, P., A. F. A. Cantafora, S. Stella, S. Barbieri and C. Crimella (2013). Microbiological survey of milk and dairy products from a small scale dairy processing unit in Maroua (Cameroon). Food Control, 32(2), 366–370. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonfoh, B., A. Wasem, A. N. Traoré, A. Fané, H. Spillmann, C. F. Simbé, I.O. Alfaroukh, J.  Nicolet, Z. Farah and J. Zinsstag (2003). Microbiological quality of cow’s milk taken at different intervals from the udder to the selling point in Bamako (Mali). Food Control, 14(7), 495–500. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bouzaid, M., R. Chatoui, A. Hasib and A. Mennane (2012). Qualité hygiénique du lait de colportage prélevé des points de vente de la ville de Rabat. Les Technologies de Laboratoire, 7(26), 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cempirkova, R. (2006). Factors negatively influencing microbial contamination of milk. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica, 39(4), 220–226. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chye, F.Y., A.Abdullah and M. K. Ayob (2004). Bacteriological quality and safety of raw milk in Malaysia. Food Microbiol., 21(5), 535–541. [Google Scholar]
  6. El Moslemany, A.M., G. P. Keefe, I. R. Dohoo, J. J. Wichtel, H. Stryhn and R. T. Dingwell (2010). The association between bulk tank milk analysis for raw milk quality and on-farm management practices. Prev. Vet. Med. (95), 32–40. [Google Scholar]
  7. EU (1990). Community procedure for the establishment of a maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin, Off. J. Eu. Comm., L224, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  8. Godefay, B. and B. Molla (2000). Bacteriological quality of raw cow’s milk from four dairy farms and milk collection centre in and around Addis Ababa. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr, 113, 276-278. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gran, H.M., A. N. Mutukumira, A. Wetlesen and J. A. Narvhus (2002). Smallholder dairy processing in Zimbabwe: Hygienic practices during milking and the microbiological quality of the milk at the farm and on delivery. Food Control, 13(1), 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  10. Grimaud, P., M. Serunjogi and N. Grillet  (2007). An evaluation of milk quality in Uganda:value chain assessment and recommendations. Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev., 7(5), 1-16. [Google Scholar]
  11. Harrigan, W.F. and M. E. Mac Cance (1976). Laboratory methods in food and dairy microbiology,   Academic Press, London. [Google Scholar]
  12. IDF  (1974).  Milk Bacteria Count. International Dairy Federation (IDF). Brussels Standards 73/74. [Google Scholar]
  13. IDF (1990). Handbook on Milk Collection in Warm Developing Countries. International Dairy Federation (IDF), Brussels. [Google Scholar]
  14. IDF (1991). Milk and Milk Products.  Microorganisms Colony Count  at 30°C.International Dairy Federation (IDF), Brussels. [Google Scholar]
  15. ISO 6579 (1990). Microbiology- General Guideline on the Method for the Detection of Salmonella. International Standard Organization. Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  16. ISO (2004). Modification of the Isolation Media and the Haemolysis Test and Inclusion of Precision Data. International Standard Organization. Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  17. J.O.R.A (1993). Les Normes Microbiologiques. Journal Officiel de la République Algérienne Démocratique et Populaire. Décret 69 du 27 Octobre 1993 correspondant au 11 Djoumada El Oula 1414. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaouche-Adjlane, S., R. Benhacine, F. Ghozlane and A. Mati (2014a). Nutritional and hygienic quality of raw milk in the Mid-Northern region of Algeria: correlations and risk factors, Sci. World. J., 7 pages, 131593. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaouche, S., N. Bouguerra and S. Mesbahi (2014b). Prevalence of Some Pathogenic Bacteria of Raw Milk in Algeria.  Ach. Biomed. Sci., 2(2), 30- 33 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaouche, S. and A. Mati (2017). Effets des pratiques d’élevage sur la variation de la qualité hygiénique et nutritionnelle du lait cru dans la région médio-septentrionale d’Algérie. Revue Méd. Vét., 168, 7-9, 151-163. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lues, J.F.R., H. De Beer, A. Jacoby, K. E. Jansen and K. Shale (2010). Microbial quality of milk, produced by small scale farmers in a peri-urban area in South Africa. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 4(17), 1823–1830. [Google Scholar]
  22. MADR (2017): Rapport annuel des statistiques agricoles du Ministère de l’Agriculture et du Développement Rural, MADR, Alger, Algérie, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mellenberger, R. and J. Kirk (2001). Mastitis Control Program for Staph. aureus Infected Dairy Cows. University of California Davis: Extension Bulletin, 41, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  24. Millogo, V., K.S. Sjaunja, G. A. Ouedraogo and S. Agenas (2010). Raw milk hygiene at farms, processing units and local markets in Burkina Faso. Food Control, 21(7), 1070–1074. [Google Scholar]
  25. NF ISO 7954 (1987): Norme Française relative au Dénombrement des Levures et des Moisissures par Comptage des Colonies à 25°C. [Google Scholar]
  26. NF V 08-057-1 (2004): Microbiologie des Aliments, méthode de routine pour le dénombrement des staphylocoques à coagulase positive par comptage des colonies à 37°C. Partie 1: Technique avec confirmation des colonies. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pistocchini, E., S. Stella, P. Belli, A.F.A. Cantafora, J. Turini, M. Zecchini and C. Crimella (2009). Dairy production in periurban area of Niamey: milk quality and microbial contamination. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 41 (2), 145– 147. [Google Scholar]
  28. Semereab, T. and B. Molla (2001). Bacteriological quality of raw milk of camel (Camelus dromedarius) in afar region (Ethiopia). J. Camel Pract. Res., 8 (1), 51-54. [Google Scholar]
  29. Soler, A., C. Ponsell, M. De Paz and M. Nunez (1995). The microbiological quality of milk produced in the Balearic Islands. Int. Dairy J., 5 (1), 69–74. [Google Scholar]